If Scalia really is saying what it seems he is, he apparently has less understanding of the original intent of the Framers than I do. That's just sad.
Yeah, the Framers were real big on buggery. That's why they included it in the Bill of Rights.
A tangent: A lawyer was telling the woman who wanted to wear her 1 inch cross necklac to get a job someplace other than with the school system which prohibited non-pc jewelry. Why didn't these same liberals tell the homosexuals to move to a pro-soddomy state like vermont? hypocracy.
Are you idiotic enough to think that the BoR is a "grant" of your rights?
They didn't include heterosexual oral sex in their either. Guess there's no right to eat white bread, because it's not in the BoR.
What a moronic argument.
posted on 06/26/2003 8:29:23 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson