Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan
There is no consitutional right to privacy.

But there is. You may not like that the Court is Constitutionally given the necessary power to interpret the Constitution -- but they have been -- and therefore their decisions are the law of the land, unless challenged by the legistlative, executive, and citizens of the US -- primarily by Constitutional amendment.

Procedure was properly followed -- at least to the point that no amendment seems to be arising from the other branches.

If you accept the Constitution, you have to accept the procedures it lays out for its interpretation and enforcement.

60 posted on 06/28/2003 1:35:36 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: jlogajan
If you accept the Constitution, you have to accept the procedures it lays out for its interpretation and enforcement.

The Constitution doesn't lay out any procedures for interpretation. SCOTUS erred quite egregiously, and we have every right to shout that fact from the rooftops, without in any way diminishing our fidelity to the Constitution.

79 posted on 06/28/2003 2:12:01 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson