I was demonstrating that your argument was invalid. If "God does not make mistakes" proves that one disorder does not exist, then it proves that no disorder exists. Which is clearly absurd.
My argument was a reductio ad absurdum, which is a valid method of proving an argument invalid.
Excuse me, but what part of
God does not make mistakes do you not understand?
Maybe you will when you stand before Him and be asked to explain why you openly mocked Him like that.