Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DAnconia55
I think you forgot the </sarcasm> tag. Or are you by any chance being so deliberately outrageous as to try to point out the absurdity of libertarianism taken to an extreme?
188 posted on 06/29/2003 6:29:14 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
Polycarp:
"SCOTUS just undermined every law in the country based upon public morals."



Good. About damned time, too.
-186- posted by DAnconia55


aristeides wrote:
I think you forgot the </sarcasm> tag. Or are you by any chance being so deliberately outrageous as to try to point out the absurdity of libertarianism taken to an extreme?
-to 186-

The true absurdity is your view that SCOTUS just undermined every law in the country based upon 'public morals'.

You claim to be an attorny, an 'officer of the court', yet you dishonor our constitutional system of law.
- Go figure. -
204 posted on 06/29/2003 6:49:40 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weakn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
I think you forgot the tag. Or are you by any chance being so deliberately outrageous as to try to point out the absurdity of libertarianism taken to an extreme?

Hmm. We're miscommunicating. I'll be direct.

All laws that are called 'public morals' laws that have nothing to do with preventing force or fraud should be overturned.

205 posted on 06/29/2003 6:51:19 PM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson