Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
You didn't see a problem with the law in that it was legal for a man and woman to do it but wrong for two men? It was a bad law...

Exactly.
The fact that these sodomy laws were only applied to homosexuals, yet heterosexuals were given a pass reveals their hypocritical and bigoted nature...just as the hypocrisy and phoniness of the those sounding the alarm about this ruling is obvious in these threads.

Clearly the majority of Americans in both major political parties do not want to live under a theocracy...especially a self styled cafeteria Christianity brand of theocracy promoted by those who think they can selectively enforce only those Biblical morals they choose and only against those they find personally offensive.

Who wants people like these influencing any public policy? Not most Americans, that's for sure.

69 posted on 06/29/2003 1:01:42 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Jorge
I wouldn't of had an issue with the law if it had been applied to both though...

Either people can do it or they can't... you can't enforce it if its not equally applied...
74 posted on 06/29/2003 1:13:14 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Jorge
especially a self styled cafeteria Christianity brand of theocracy promoted by those who think they can selectively enforce only those Biblical morals they choose and only against those they find personally offensive.

Christian and Jewish and Buddhist and Hindu and Sikh and Muslim and Jain and Parsee as well and common sense, natural law and public health issues.

171 posted on 06/29/2003 6:04:06 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson