Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramius
My kids learned to swim in 4 feet of water. They didn't need a deep end. Our public pool utilizes a deep end for diving. Beyond that I see nothing wrong with the idea of having a pool that gets no deeper than 6 feet if diving isn't an option. In fact - I'd love to have a community pool like they described.
27 posted on 06/30/2003 5:44:36 PM PDT by Frapster (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Frapster
Beyond that I see nothing wrong with the idea of having a pool that gets no deeper than 6 feet if diving isn't an option

As a kid, I fondly remember dropping objects to the bottom on the deep end and swimming the 10 feet to the bottom to get them. It developed good breathing, muscles and good planning skills. Six feet just wouldn't have done it. Children need this sort of activity, whether it's in swimming, biking, dodgeball or whatever. All this silly take-away-the-risk emphasis is breeding sissies.

32 posted on 06/30/2003 5:49:51 PM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Frapster
a pool that gets no deeper than 6 feet if diving isn't an option.

When, again, is diving not an option?

36 posted on 06/30/2003 5:52:01 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson