Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ala. Judge Loses Ten Commandments Appeal
Washington Post ^ | July 1, 2003 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/01/2003 2:47:12 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian

ATLANTA - A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that a Ten Commandments monument the size of a washing machine must be removed from the Alabama Supreme Court building.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a ruling by a federal judge who said that the 2 1/2-ton granite monument, placed there by Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore, violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

[snip]

Moore put the monument in the rotunda of the courthouse in the middle of the night two summers ago. The monument features tablets bearing the Ten Commandments and historical quotations about the place of God in law.

[click link to read remainder of article]

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: churchandstate; roymoore; tencommandments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 621-630 next last
To: Stopislamnow
And calling a nameless screenname "sir" on an internet bulletin board while advocating ignoble murder over putting up a shrine to your religion on public property is the surest sign that someone is an underachieving, underearning dolt who wants to sound infinitely more important than he is.
161 posted on 07/01/2003 6:50:36 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Nobody wants to look at the flip side.

The point is very simple..congress made no law respecting what Judge Moore did concerning religion. People like you trying to convince everyone else that they cannot comprehend the simple meaning of words are dispicable.

162 posted on 07/01/2003 6:52:35 PM PDT by rottweiller_inc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
How much longer before Christians will be worshipping in the catacombs again?

Just worship some place other than public buildings and there will be no problems.

163 posted on 07/01/2003 6:53:39 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian (You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that a Ten Commandments monument the size of a washing machine must be removed from the Alabama Supreme Court building.

Didn't Old Hickory say something about the "Supreme Court has spoken, now let them enforce it?"

Someone posted that on another thread the other day and it jogged my memory.

164 posted on 07/01/2003 6:55:19 PM PDT by Mulder (Live Free or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
The entire Bill of Rights applies to the states, via the 14th Amendment. That's law older than your grandmother.

Next.

165 posted on 07/01/2003 6:57:14 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
After he got out of jail for contempt, he would run for Gov. or AG and win in a landslide.

Are convicted felons eligble for public office in Alabama?

166 posted on 07/01/2003 6:57:18 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian (You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Here's a link to the exact wording on the monument: http://www.tencommandmentsdefense.org/TenCommandmentsMonument.htm
167 posted on 07/01/2003 6:58:24 PM PDT by qwertyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I'll answer that one: no. But that's not what this case was about. Does the Constitution prohibit religious displays placed by the government for a strictly religious purpose, limited to a single religion to the exclusion of others? Yes. And that is exactly what Judge Moore said he was doing.

Just read the case. Why are so many compelled to spout off about things they know nothing about?

168 posted on 07/01/2003 6:59:55 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: qwertyz
It is right there in the opinion, linked on this thread. And while you're at it, read what the good Judge had to say about the motives for putting it up.
169 posted on 07/01/2003 7:02:25 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Where did I advocate ignoble murder?

DU is calling to you, can you hear it?

170 posted on 07/01/2003 7:02:43 PM PDT by Stopislamnow (Underearning, Underachieving dolt, apparently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
And I did give you an answer. Please read my response again.

Yes you did. My apologies.

171 posted on 07/01/2003 7:06:59 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Oh, Spiff. The 10th refers to rights NOT set forth in the Constitution - or reserved to the people under the 9th. It does not give the states the right to trump the Federal Government on the issue of interpreting the U.S. Constitution. If you think it does, please indicate where.
172 posted on 07/01/2003 7:09:29 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Great. We're getting screwed by our own guys...

Wake up to reality. There are "no" conservatives in public office. The move toward Marxism/Socialism is complete and now only a "slow" progression that the masses of the dumb cannot invision is necessary. The culture war has already been decided. Only a revolution could stop the tide, and the people don't have the character and will for that. Enjoy America while you can. It's going to be gone very, very soon.....in our lifetimes.

173 posted on 07/01/2003 7:09:36 PM PDT by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
Think hundreds of armed civilians.

It's time to get bloody and defend our rights.

So what you're advocating is the murder of US Marshals?

174 posted on 07/01/2003 7:10:07 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: freedomsnotfree
They were the "black robed" brigade.

Lenin called them the "Black Hundreds"

175 posted on 07/01/2003 7:12:38 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
Not even that, FL - you can worship in a public building as much as you like - as long as the government isn't assisting, participating, or endorsing the worship of your religion. Why Christians, or members of any other faith, have a problem with this is beyond me.
176 posted on 07/01/2003 7:12:45 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
California, Texas, Arizona, Florida, and New Mexico for example will soon be overwhelmingly Catholic, not protestant.

New Mexico has been overwhelmingly Catholic for several hundred years.

177 posted on 07/01/2003 7:14:06 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian (You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Why are so many compelled to spout off about things they know nothing about?

I dunno. Perhaps so we can be lectured to by pompous asses?

I didn't mention Judge Moore. I asked a simple question, not directly referencing this case, to get a feel for where Dog was coming from.

His answer, which I failed to read the first time, was sufficient for me to understand his views here.

Your answer was sufficient for me to put you in the category mentioned above.

FR is great, ain't it?

178 posted on 07/01/2003 7:14:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: FreeLibertarian
Just worship some place other than public buildings and there will be no problems.

Who gave you the right to tell people where and when they can worship?

For over 70 years, church services were held in the House of Representatives every Sunday. Jefferson attended regularly. Was Jefferson supporting an unconstitutional act?

179 posted on 07/01/2003 7:15:34 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
"So what you're advocating is the murder of US Marshals?"

That's what it sounds like to me.

The shallowness of comprehension on this issue is astounding. Don't you people understand that this Judge openly states that he put up this monument to further the influence of Christianity on the operation of the law in his court? That's not what I say - that's what HE says. Do you people really believe that the Constitution endorses a theocracy?

180 posted on 07/01/2003 7:17:00 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 621-630 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson