Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DPB101
So Federal judges see where this is going.

According to the court's opinion, Moore filed his own brief, in which he stated that, as Chief Justice of Alabama, he would have the final say as to whether the 11th Circuit's order was constitutional or not. Federal judges, including (especially?) conservative ones, do not take kindly to threats that their decisions will be defied, so they added some very pointed language saying that they "expect" Judge Moore to comply with their decision unless it is reversed by the Supreme Court, but that, "If necessary the court order will be enforced." That discussion is accompanied by citations to the court decisions from 1962 and 1963 which forced Governors Wallace and Barnett to obey school desegregation orders.

12 posted on 07/01/2003 3:10:19 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
I hope Moore ignores them. Let's see the court enforce its own order. The bastards deserve to be hung for treason.
15 posted on 07/01/2003 3:14:41 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Here's a link to the decision in PDF format. "Strongly worded" is an understatement.

http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200216708.pdf
24 posted on 07/01/2003 3:27:15 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
>>...That discussion is accompanied by citations to the court decisions from 1962 and 1963 which forced Governors Wallace and Barnett to obey school desegregation orders...<<

Court decisions didn't force them to obey, the National Guard did, as I recall.

Question is, would George W. Bush call out the National Guard to force a conservative judge to remove the 10 Commandments??

And how would that look during a re-election bid??

131 posted on 07/01/2003 5:37:31 PM PDT by FReepaholic (Freepers, a fierce warlike tribe from FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Insofar as it is a gross afront to the sovereignty of the State of Alabama for the United States to presume to dictate what kinds of statues Alabama chooses to have it its Supreme Court building, I would think it appropriate if Justice Moore and the Alabama State Police battled it out with the Federal marshals to see whether the statue would stand. There may be no other way to restore state sovereignty.

It is remarkable the degree to which the Federal courts are solicitous to invent any and all rights in derogation of state sovereignty, and utterly oblivious to the most fundamental rights of property of the citizens of the United States. The fathers of our country would weep and rage if they saw the perversion of their brilliant design.

295 posted on 07/01/2003 9:43:33 PM PDT by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson