Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
. Do I understand now that you are simply decrying a general attack on all religion, as opposed to saying that this Court, by prohibiting the preference of one religion by the top judicial officer of the state, was attacking all religion?

I am sensitized to attacks on religion in general by the courts because of their wholesale slaughter of religion in public for many years. So I see this as yet another attack. Yes, I think that Judge Moore should theoretically allow other religious documents that have informed the original documents and laws of the country, but since the 10 Commandments are by far the most influential, I support him and am opposed to this decision.

356 posted on 07/01/2003 11:39:50 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: pram; Kryptonite
Enjoyed it folks. I'm outta here.
363 posted on 07/01/2003 11:52:57 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson