Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Has Contingency Plan for Liberia; doubts there is a compelling U.S. interest...
Associated Press ^ | 07-02-03

Posted on 07/02/2003 8:02:50 AM PDT by Brian S

Bush Weighs Whether to Send Peacekeepers to Liberia, Rumsfeld Creates Contingency Plan

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON July 2 — The Bush administration struggled Wednesday with the question of whether it should send peacekeepers to Liberia, an idea opposed by a U.S. military already stretched thin with other commitments around the world.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld attended a White House meeting Wednesday morning on the issue after the National Security Council failed to agree on a course of action the day before, officials said.

Rumsfeld is opposed to international proposals that the United States send 2,000 troops to head a force of 3,000 peacekeepers in the West African nation.

Still, Rumsfeld took with him to Wednesday's meeting a contingency plan for such a deployment, should the president order it. The Pentagon routinely works up and keeps on hand such plans for numerous problems around the world.

More than 10,000 American troops are still working in and around Afghanistan since the beginning of the global war on terror in September 2001 and nearly 150,000 troops are stationed in a violent and troubled postwar Iraq.

Defense officials say they are trying to avoid committing troops to Liberia as well.

Rumsfeld also doubts there is a compelling U.S. interest in Liberia's affairs, aides say.

Senior officials said Tuesday that no decision was imminent. But thousands of Liberians celebrated outside the U.S. Embassy in the Liberian capital of Monrovia late Tuesday as rumors spread about possible U.S. intervention.

One senior administration official said Bush was reluctant to send troops purely as peacekeepers. But if the troops were given a clear mission as part of a defined coalition, Bush might be more inclined, this official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Another administration official said the White House did not want to take the military option off the table for fear of making headlines just before Bush starts a trip to Africa next Monday.

U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan has suggested the United States take a leadership role in peacekeeping. West African leaders asked on Monday for 2,000 American troops to head a predominantly African force to stop the turmoil and keep the peace. The Africans said they want an answer before Bush leaves for the continent, but administration officials were noncommittal about whether they will have a response by then.

France, Britain and both sides in Liberia's fighting also have pushed for an American role in a peace force for the country founded by freed American slaves in 1847.

The current round of fighting in Liberia began three years ago as rebels began trying to oust President Charles Taylor, who won contested elections and took the presidency in 1997 after a 1989-96 civil war.

Fighting killed hundreds of trapped civilians in Monrovia just last month, and the war has displaced more than 1 million Liberians.

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
Rummy is right on with this issue.
1 posted on 07/02/2003 8:02:50 AM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan has suggested the United States take a leadership role in peacekeeping

first of all mr anti america Kofi can go F##k Himself

secondly this is a terrible idea. it has somalia written all over it
2 posted on 07/02/2003 8:06:01 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Listen to Rummy, GW.
3 posted on 07/02/2003 8:06:31 AM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
good idea.
4 posted on 07/02/2003 8:14:13 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Go Rummy. Now the world is begging for us. Right how about the Ruskies and the French take care of this one.

5 posted on 07/02/2003 8:14:57 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant; Brian S
Why didn't the UN ask France and Germany to head up this peacekeeping action?
6 posted on 07/02/2003 8:20:59 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Thousands of citizens jubilate outside the U.S. Embassy in the Liberian capital Monrovia Tuesday, July 1, 2003, after hearing a local rumor that U.S. President George Bush had agreed to send peacekeeping troops into the war-torn West African nation. A White House official said the U.S. was 'actively discussing' ways to uphold the ceasefire in Liberia. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis)

7 posted on 07/02/2003 8:21:13 AM PDT by berserker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
"The Bush administration struggled"...

Nope, no bias in THIS AP story, nosiree. Note that just about all stories about this administration use words such as "tried," "attempted," "struggled," "made an effort," instead of actually ACTING on a matter. Most network TV news reports use the same mechanism. They never describe decisive nor incisive action, just (implied as feeble) ATTEMPTS.

Certainly no bias there.


8 posted on 07/02/2003 8:27:24 AM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
Clinton was always "trying real hard" on various issues.
9 posted on 07/02/2003 8:28:12 AM PDT by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of American Anger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brian S

"We need to go to Liberia about
as badly as I need a third nostril."

10 posted on 07/02/2003 8:35:34 AM PDT by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
This makes me really angry. Think of the situation in Iraq with all the torture and not to mention Saddam Hussein's record of taking it outside his borders and causing trouble, but that was not ok with the UN to send US troops. But now they want the US to send our men and women when it pleases them because we are their policeman. They can go to hell. This is sickening and I wish this administration would put them in their place that do NOTHING and expect the US to be the one all the time.
11 posted on 07/02/2003 10:06:13 AM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
Let's deport all the UN staff in this country to Liberia, so they can demonstrate their all-encompassing wisdom.
12 posted on 07/02/2003 1:28:37 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Road Map = Road Kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson