Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Well, I am not meaning to be argumentative with you, so I'll let it go after this if you do not think it sufficient. To prove that Kennedy was in a position to do so, and that he did, I merely need to point out that he is the Supreme Court Justice who wrote the majority opinion.

To prove that he did so using a libertarian argument, I guess it is a matter of opinion on if the following is a libertarian concept or not:

"At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life."
To me, it strikes me as being such.
5 posted on 07/02/2003 11:34:06 AM PDT by William McKinley (My new blog that no one cares about can be found at http://williammckinley.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
"At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life."

Why does that sound like a libertarian argument? That sounds more like something that you'd find in It Takes a Village.

6 posted on 07/02/2003 11:57:58 AM PDT by dirtboy (Not enough words in FR taglines to adequately describe the dimensions of Hillary's thunderous thighs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson