Posted on 07/02/2003 11:56:18 PM PDT by kattracks
Here's an endorsement New York Sen. Hillary Clinton may wish she hadn't received.
The first lady of France, Bernadette Chirac, the wife of notorious anti-American French President Jacques Chirac, is encouraging Mrs. Clinton to run for the White House.
"There are a lot of women who hope one day she'll run for the presidency of the United States and that she'll win," Mrs. Chirac said Wednesday in an interview with France's state-run TV network TF1.
Mrs. Chirac said that having Hillary in the White House would spur "women across the whole world to engage in politics," according to the Associated Press.
Clinton, who is in France this week trying to boost sagging sales of her memoir "Living History," rebuffed Mrs. Chirac's entreaty.
"I don't have the intention to run," the former first lady said according to a French translation of her remarks reported by the AP. "I want to do my job as a senator."
Editor's Note: Frustrated by the media puffery of Hillary's new book? -- you can fight back and expose Hillary: Click Here Now
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
A U.S. Senator in France promoting a book. Any of you people out there still doubt that her only goal in life is to be "wanted" and loved?
As our (MOSTLY American) troops risk their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, as the President and SOD Rumsfeld are working hard to gain assistance in $$$ and troops from other nations - Hillary sells out America to the EU and tells them she speaks for the Democratic Party:
"I know my husband received the same intelligence information [during his presidency as did Bush]."(how does she know?)...Clinton asserted that "the real question is have we obtained accurate information, or have the findings been altered for military or political purposes?" ...America should seek "a secure and solid foundation" for relations with Europe, instead of "relying only upon our [U.S.] military strength." .. "for eight years we were on the right course to a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other." ...In the Der Spiegel interview, Clinton asserted that her husband sought to pass "effective laws" and proposed "more money" to carry out the struggle against terror, but "the Republicans prevented" measures from becoming enacted...Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party...Der Spiegel concludes: As Europeans become more familiar with Clinton and her views, their impact will be felt as they bring money and influence to her or a like politician's campaign...The socialist European expectation will be that a Democratic victory will bring into power a U.S. government more to the liking of one-world European politicians.
~ Hillary Clinton Der Spiegel interview, June 17, 2003, .
Rush article:
![]() |
***Stop the Tape: Hillary Reads Gulp Line For First Time*** |
( play clips of Clinton at the Jackson memorial and Hillary's reading) ( roll Hillary one more time and compare it to Hillary's screaming speech) Watch The Best of Rush on TV... (Clinton's Laugh/Cry... |
|
![]() |
Listen to Rush: (
roll Hillary one more time and compare it to Hillary's screaming speech)"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration that somehow you are not patriotic!" ~ Hillary Clinton
Nah, it's not the "debate" ~ it's your divisiveness, deceit and betrayal: selling out America and our troops to UN-American/NON-American nations and groups for personal power's sake during wartime, Ms. Benedict Rodham Clinton.
|
Our wise founders provided a way for future leaders to deal with a "Clinton". It's time:
Conducting Foreign Relations Without Authority: The Logan Act
Abstract: The Logan Act was intended to prohibit United States citizens without authority from interfering in relations between the United States and foreign governments. There appear to have been no prosecutions under the Act in its almost 200 year history. However, there have been a number of judicial references to the Act, and it is not uncommon for it to be used as a political weapon. Although attempts have been made to repeal the Act, it remains law and at least a potential sanction to be used against anyone who without authority interferes in the foreign relations of the United States.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.