Skip to comments.
Democrats Assail Bush's 'bring Them On' Comment
AP ^
| 7/3/03
| Alex Ortolani
Posted on 07/03/2003 1:22:22 PM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: JeanS
Remember, if you Ctl-F the Starr Report for "oral-anal contact", you get several hits.
And the Democrats say they're concerned about the dignity of the presidency.
To: JeanS
Enemy Taunting Presidents:
22
posted on
07/03/2003 1:58:17 PM PDT
by
Stultis
("When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature they will like the strong horse." --UBL)
To: JeanS
When the 3rd ID & the Marines moved through Iraq, they used loudspeakers to taunt the Iraqi troops (and irregulars, too). The Iraqi's apparently couldn't stand being dissed and therefore got suckered into a series of ill-considered frontal attacks.
So my question is this: If this was such a brilliant and innovative tactic then, why is it being criticized now? Oh, I forgot. This is GWB we're talking about. Guess that automatically makes this criticism valid in certain political circles...
23
posted on
07/03/2003 1:59:37 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Trying desperately to ignore Hillary.... and not succeeding.)
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: The South Texan
"wimps = wussies"Did you know that "WIMP" is actually an acronym?
Whimpering
Iincompetent
Malingering
P.....rhymes with "wussy"
25
posted on
07/03/2003 2:05:05 PM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(M1911A1: The ORIGINAL "Point and Click" interface!)
To: Scawsby
Yeah. It's unacceptable to have an American President winning wars, defeating and demoralizing our enemies, advancing human liberty and the national interest, and increasing the security of Americans and our allies unless he behaves like a martydom seeking jihadi. Yup, really bright and insightful comment there, Scawsby. I bet that kind of analysis really wow's 'em over at BartCop and DU.
26
posted on
07/03/2003 2:08:04 PM PDT
by
Stultis
(Do I really need sarcasm tags?)
To: JeanS
Dick Gephardt said Bush's comments were hardly presidentialAnd Bill Clinton testifying before Grand Jury in a perjury-sex case is??
27
posted on
07/03/2003 2:11:43 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: JeanS
28
posted on
07/03/2003 2:13:20 PM PDT
by
4mycountry
(Japanese drain pipe is so tiny, please don't flush too much toilet papers.)
To: JeanS
Funny how they didn't learn from how their carrier complaints bombed.
To: JeanS
They prefer Clinton's statements:
" The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people"
--Bill Clinton, during an interview on MTV in 1993
"You know the one thing that's wrong with this country? Everyone gets a chance to have their fair say."
-- Bill Clinton, May 29, 1993, The White House
"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans . . . ."
--William J. Clinton, USA Today, March 11, 1993
When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly.... [However, now] there's a lot of irresponsibility. And so a lot of people say there's too much freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it."
-- Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"
It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is"
-- excerpts from Bill Clinton's grand jury testimony
To: JeanS
Here is what Clinton considered a real danger to the world. Obviously Democrats prefer that, ignoring that exactly that attitude was what allowed Saddam and the terrorists to get stronger and attack us.
"Another global danger we face is climate change."
--- Clinton speech on foreign policy, Feb. 26, 1999
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/clintfps.htm
To: JeanS
NOT SURPRISED BY THIS!Democraps have been trying to destroy America's image of a REAL MAN for quite some time.The only democraps that like real men are being sodomized at this very moment! HA!
To: cardinal4
Paul Begala and Tony Coehlo were both so upset today on Crossfire about the "Bring it on" statement. I loved it.
I say we make "Bring it on" our slogan to the Dims in the campaign. That's what a love most about our man GW.
Straight talk, no BS. Wish there were more like him.
To: krb
You got it!
And ... "taunting the enemy" is not even in their playbook - because they don't have the spine for it!!
34
posted on
07/03/2003 2:46:40 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: 2rightsleftcoast
I say we make "Bring it on" our slogan to the Dims in the campaign. Does that mean that it's time to retire "Let's roll!"?
-PJ
To: JeanS
. The Florida senator said the phrase "may be appropriate for a referee in a Las Vegas boxing match, but not for the man we trust to lead our men and women who are in harm's way."
Excuse me SENATOR, but just what the hell do you think this is if it isn't a punch up?
Jerks!
36
posted on
07/03/2003 2:52:23 PM PDT
by
tet68
(Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
To: 2rightsleftcoast
Bring It On......wouldn't that work for Shelley and Davis, too?
Ha!
37
posted on
07/03/2003 2:55:11 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Pray for America & Israel AND become a monthly donor to Free Republic. Or ELSE!)
To: CyberAnt
"taunting the enemy" is not even in their playbook
They can't even bring themselves to say,
"Saddam, your mother smells of elderberries and we fart in your general direction."
Might offend someone.
38
posted on
07/03/2003 2:57:25 PM PDT
by
tet68
(Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
To: tet68
Oh yes ... heaven forbid that we offend some despot!
39
posted on
07/03/2003 3:05:39 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: 2rightsleftcoast
Begala is a loser. He was freaking out over the flight suit as well. They cant stand seeing W act Presidential. Understandable, really; before GWB, there hasnt been anyone to act Presidential since W's Dad.
40
posted on
07/03/2003 3:12:02 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson