Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
Why should I give a crap about what a couple of homosexuals do in their home? This is America! You can do what ever you want. I'd rather focus on retaining and expanding freedom than restricting it. I want to be free to practice my religion the way I see fit. I have enough trouble keeping myself on the "straight and narrow" let alone trying to control others. Let the homosexuals do their thing and I will do mine. Another thing, If homos want the rights of married people why don't they just establish them by contract rather than screwing with my culture and religion. They can form a LLC or other corporate structure and designate power of attorney and survivorship or if necessary adopt each other. I am not a lawyer but if current laws hinder this they should be changed to accomodate this. Americans should be able to do what they want to do.
3 posted on 07/04/2003 3:18:37 AM PDT by Outrance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Outrance
This is America!

...which is why you should be very disturbed that Justice Kennedy cited precendents established in UN and EU court decisions.

European Legal Brief Threatened Trouble for US Over Texas Sodomy Law

As debate continues on the significance of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Texas' law against sodomy, it has gone largely unnoticed that the majority's decision relied on judicial rulings made in Europe and at the United Nations. The pivotal role of international law in the Supreme Court decision seems to confirm the concerns of conservative legal scholars, who have long warned that laws developed in Europe and at the UN could be imposed on the US. The majority opinion was guided, specifically, by the pro-homosexual rulings of the European Court of Human Rights.

In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy also refers to a "Friends of the Court" brief submitted by Mary Robinson, former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, which asserts, "This Court should not decide in a vacuum whether criminalization of same-sex sodomy between consenting adults violates constitutional guarantees of privacy and equal protection. Other nations with similar histories, legal systems, and political cultures have already answered these questions in the affirmative..This Court should pay due respect to these opinions of humankind."

Robinson's brief also says, "Legal concepts like 'privacy,' 'liberty,' and 'equality' are not US property, but have global meaning." Robinson argues that the United States should be "construing these terms in light of foreign interpretations," even warning the Supreme Court that "To ignore these precedents virtually ensures that this Court's ruling will generate controversies with the United State's closest global allies.".... [Can you believe the effrontery of these commisar wanna-be's?!]

Writing in dissent, Justice Scalia condemned the importation of foreign laws into US judicial deliberations: "Constitutional elements do not spring into existence.as the Court seems to believe, because foreign nations decriminalize conduct.. 'this Court should not impose foreign moods, fads, or fashions on Americans.'"

Whole article can be read here

God bless Justice Scalia. We need a constitutional amendment to hamstring the NWO commisars who will stop at nothing to impose their perverted will on us.

4 posted on 07/04/2003 5:42:31 AM PDT by ishmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Outrance
HEAR, HEAR!!!!!
8 posted on 07/04/2003 6:45:23 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Cuba serĂ¡ libre...soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson