[Parley Baer]

Remember now that this story is from the New York Times which is not exactly friendly to the military. They would rather see the money spent on social programs. I would want to see more sources before making up my mind on the subject. Parley

[Dick Vomer]

Simple problem solver....

have the CEO, CFO, retired Marine "consultants" and 1 congressman fly the Osprey for the next year exclusivly on short trips. Rotate the congressional supporters weekly so that they all can demonstrate how "useful" this machine is.

I mean, it's good enough to transport troops into a hot LZ. So why not a safe little commute around the country.... seems easy enough.

Greed....follow the money.

[eno_]

Remember now that this story is from the New York Times which is not exactly friendly to the military...

It's still an obvious deathtrap. And if it wasn't, it's still hideously expensive. Somebody in the world must be able to gear up to make enough helicopters to replace the old Sea Knights and etc.

[wjcsux]

Remember now that this story is from the New York Times which is not exactly friendly to the military. They would rather see the money spent on social programs. I would want to see more sources before making up my mind on the subject. Parley
The reason this POS of an aircraft is under consideration by the USMC is the NY Congressional delegation wants it. Bell is located in NY. The Marines have been basically told that they are stuck with it. This thing has sucked the USMC dry of all R&D funds that could be better spent on other things the Corps really needs.