I've read a lot of Rabinowitz but the shallowness of her attack on Coulter's book puzzles me. It seems almost reflexive, as if she's not really able to mount an in-depth intellectual assessment of Coulter's arguments because of ingrained prejudices against McCarthy. The fact that she totally ignores Venona and its implications is damning as far as I'm concerned.
I wonder...have you actually read "Treason" or are you basing your criticisms on reviews like Andrew Sullivan's and hearsay?
Got to find time to read the book...
Yea. Rabinowitz is Jewish. She just might not agree with people who defend Nazis.
I wonder...have you actually read "Treason" or are you basing your criticisms on reviews like Andrew Sullivan's and hearsay?
I haven't read TREASON, nor do I intend to.
Ann Coulter is a polemicist, not a serious writer. Her intent is to whip her followers and the rabid right into a frenzy, which she seems to do, quite well, every time she writes or makes a television appearance, as is evidenced on this website. (Being a leggy blonde only helps her with the male contingent.)
I prefer Dorothy Rabinowitz and Peggy Noonan to Coulter. Seasoned, reasoned, nuanced, and thoughtful.
They're also older and more statuesque, which matches my taste in women perfectly.