Skip to comments.
A Conspiracy So Vast
The Wall Street Journal
| July 7, 2003
| DOROTHY RABINOWITZ
Posted on 07/07/2003 4:17:43 AM PDT by Dave S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-123 last
To: Bernard Marx
I chose the screen name thinking most people are better educated than they are and would see the irony. Wrong!! The book "used" to be standard reading in high school and college. I read the book over 40 years ago. Im sorry that your school experience was so unhappy that Huxley was such a peak experience for you. Personally when I was in High School I had better things to do with my life than go all goo-goo over characters in a book.
121
posted on
07/08/2003 6:33:53 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: dark_lord
1st, If you have 'valuable cargo' on board, for instance say... oh
A CONGRESSMAN you do not continue forward when you detect enemy fighters. If I am a Japanese fighter protecting my turf, who am I going to attack? The guys who are about to enter my air space and bomb my turf? Or the guy who turned and ran long before reaching my air space? Can you imagine the propoganda bonanaza the Japs would have if they had shot down a CONGRESSMAN??? The military would never allow that to happen.
2nd, Who the hell said anything about McCarthy??? My post was in response to a comment about LBJohnson's Silver Star. It had nothing to do with McCarthey. Johnson was on board as an observer. On top of that, the only reason he was there was to get 'personal knowledge of combat conditions'. In other words, he had NO military purpose for being on board.
You lack of knowledge on political motivations and agendas has not precluded your 'slam' on a post on which you lack accurate reading comprehension.
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
Mea Culpa. The thread was on McCarthy and I did not read your reference to Johnson. I apologize. You are correct, Johnson did not deserve the Silver Star. As to the "mechanical difficulties" part, yeah they might have used that as an excuse.
Separating might in reality have made them a target as the citation mentioned -- it happened plenty of times. The fighter pilots were not just concerned with the current raid, but also future raids. A bomber knocked down this time is a bomber they won't see next time -- so in fact a common tactic was for two or three fighters to immediately go after any bomber that separated from the group.
123
posted on
07/08/2003 10:03:16 AM PDT
by
dark_lord
(The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-123 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson