Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine
Good question Sam. And how did NASA come to the conclusion that the foam wasn't worthy of considering as cause for a fatal event? That's what I want to know.

Wouldn't you think a first grader would have had more curiosity about the foam strike than NASA management did? I sure would!
19 posted on 07/07/2003 2:13:30 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Brother, has your faith lapsed. Renew your conservatism today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
Good question Sam. And how did NASA come to the conclusion that the foam wasn't worthy of considering as cause for a fatal event? That's what I want to know.

A Nasa administrator was asked about the foam and he dismissed it. He had a foam sample on the table during one of the press conferences.

Pointing to the foam, he said he didn't think it was possible for that light a material to cause that much damage. I believe he said foam falls off all the time. They never noticed damage before.

Right now CNN is showing results of that test. It is a HUGH hole in a demo wing they have set up.

Now the question is. Since they always noticed foam fall off before on launches. Did NASA do multiple tests to see if foam falling off hitting the shuttle can cause damage?

Obviously not.

28 posted on 07/07/2003 2:52:08 PM PDT by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson