Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius
Iran will fall eventually, but the ball at the moment is Iraq. We're running into trouble fighting an urban insurgency. We've never been very good at fighting insurgencies, and it's one of our weakest areas militarily.

Don't buy the hype, Iraq is locked down solid. There are still random nutjobs from neighboring countries that can't wait to die for Allah, but they're being helped as fast as they arrive. The Iraqis are done as an organized force, and the sporadic resistance from them is far less than from the out-of-towners.

We could leap into Syria or Iran right now, and Iraq would remain firmly under our control. We don't need to cut any deals with the mullahs. We're in no danger from them or from the soon to be extinct jihadists in Iraq.

Clearly there is a lot that isn't on the table, or things that don't quite add up, but assuming that we're cutting a deal with Iran because we're floundering in Iraq is flawed reasoning.

52 posted on 07/08/2003 2:43:18 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Sarcasm: Don't leave home without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Steel Wolf
I believe that the insurgency in Iraq is getting substantial aid and advice from players in Iran, Syria and the "former" Soviet Union.
57 posted on 07/08/2003 3:26:43 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson