Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: razorbak
"Matt.15:2 Paul was an apostle, and this was the apostolic era during which Scripture was being written, and attending signs, such as the raising of the dead, were given to the apostles. Scripture has been completed. There are no more apostles,"

More self-interpreting nonsense. Note that when Judas hung himself the Apostles had to appoint and ordain a replacement Apostle for him, Matthias. (Acts 1: 21-26). What does the end of Scriptural revelation have to do with the end of preists, (presbyters), Bishops and Apostles? On the contrary, a perpetual Apostolic ministry and leadership was essential to the handing on of Divine Revelation. "Now in the church at Antioch there were prophets and teachers, Barnabas, Simeon who was called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Mana-en a member of the court of Herod the tetrarch, and Saul. While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, "Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them." Then after fasting and praying they laid their hands on them and sent them off. (Acts 13: 1-3) So the Bible proves you are wrong yet again. Jesus commanded the Apostles: "go out into all nations and teach them all things whatsoever I have taught you", (Mathew 28:20).

Are you supposing that Jesus charged the Twelve with this monumental and perpetual task without allowing them the power to ordain other Aposltes? The Apostles, in order to fulfill Christ's command, had to lay hands on other disciples to ordain them as replacements and proxies :

The Power of Apostleship is Conferred Onto Others by The Apostles:

Jesus gave the power to heal and forgive sins to the Apostles; (Luke 9:1, and Luke 22: 17-20), and the Apostles conferred these same God-given powers onto others in (I Timothy 4: 13 -14): "Till I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the council of elders laid their hands upon you".

Throughout Acts, Hebrews and Timothy, we see this Apostolic heirarchy and ordination of others in action: "Obey your leaders and submit to them; for they are keeping watch over your souls, as men who will have to give account. Hebrews 13:17


"the current Polish Pretender with the mitre that blasphemously claims the title "Pontifex Maximus" included [Pontifex Maximus means "Highest Priest" Christ is the only Highest Priest we have ore need."

Get your Latin and your scholarship straight for once so we can have a serious debate. "Pontifex Maximus" means, literally, "Supreme Pontiff", or in Catholic meaning, "bishop of bishops". "Pontiff" in eccliastical Latin translates only to "Bishop", and does not mean 'priest' in any way, shape, form or manner. As usual, the anti Catholics attack with lies, falsehoods, and utter disregard for facts.


"The "traditions" Paul referred to do not mean what the RCC erroneously teaches as tradition. Paul referred to the doctrines He taught under inspiration by the Spirit in the Scripture written by Him,"

Saint Paul's words are crystal clear in (2 Thess. 2:15): "So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the tradition which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.". In fact, Paul then commands true Christians to keep away from people like you, who refuse to understand oral traditions to be as authoratative as the written Scripture: "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is living in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us."


"Matt.15: 2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. 3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? 4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death. 5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to [his] father or [his] mother, [It is] a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; 6 And honour not his father or his mother, [he shall be free]. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. 7 [Ye] hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, 8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with [their] lips; but their heart is far from me. 9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching [for] doctrines the commandments of men."

Your Bible scholarship and attention to detail is terrible. Note that it was the Pharisees who are accusing the Apostles of not following the traditions of the Jews. Jesus then defends the Apostles, and assails the traditions of the Pharisees. The Pharisees were living according to the early Talmud, (then called the 'Mishna'). This was the man-made, early Rabinnical commentary on the Bible, and not the Bible itself. The Jews of Christ's day were indeed living according to "traditions of men", the Pharisees. For they stopped living according to the the Divinely inspired Torah and followed the teachings of the man-made Mishna, (Pharisaic commentaries on the Bible). Saint Paul, the son of a Pharisee, beautifully verifies this in (Galatians 1 13-14) when he says: "For you have heard of my former life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it; and I advanced in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the tradition of my fathers.

"You yourselves are our letter of recommendation, written on your hearts, to be known and read by all men; and you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts. (2 Corinthians 3: 2-3)


"Col.2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. {rudiments: or, elements} {make a prey: or, seduce you, or, lead you astray} Tell me anything Paul taught that contradicts Scripture. Then examine your church [the only real one as you so arrogantly put it]. The history of the RCC from its first attempts to gain ascendancy over all of the other churches in the 4th century, even going so far as to forge phony documents supposedly from Constantine that claimed preeminence for the Roman church."

As you hopefully have learned by now, if you can pay attention to detail, the "tradition of men" that Paul spoke of were the traditions of the Pharisees, the traditions he himself once followed, (Galatians `1: 13-13). The traditions that Paul himself now taught, (2 Thess. 2:15), were the legitimate traditions of God's Church, not "traditions of man". Does Paul condemn himself in 2 Thess. 2:15 when he commands Christians to follow both his epistles and oral traditions? Does Paul contradict himself in 2 Thess. 3:6 when he commands us to walk away from any brother not living in the traditions?

Again, your understanding of the Bible is shoddy.


"Sorry, but the Bible does not call Peter the head of the apostles."

No? The Bible almost always refers to the Apostles as "Peter and the eleven". How about these verses?

(1). "But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice and spoke to them.." (Acts 2:14)

(2). "and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve" (I Cor 5:15).

(3). "But go, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before into Galillee", (Mark 16:7).

(4). "Now when they had heard these things they had compunction in their heart, and said to Peter, and to the rest of the Apostles, what shall we do..." (Acts 2:37).

(5). Jesus gives the 'Keys to the Kingdom' only to Peter. (Mathew 16:18).

(6). Peter is the only Apostle allowed to walk on water. (Mathew 14:28).

(7). Only Peter is given the vision from God that all men can be saved. (Acts 10: 11- 16).

(8). Peter settles the dispute at the Council of Jersualem, and 'silenced the multitude'. (Acts 15: 7 -12).

(9). only Peter is assured by Jesus Christ Himself that his faith will never fail. (Luke 22:31-32).

(10). John outruns Peter to the Tomb, but suddenly stops and allows Peter to catch up, allowing him to be the first to go inside the Tomb of Jesus. (John 20:3-6).

(11). Jesus commands Peter, "feed my lambs, feed my lambs, feed my sheep". (John 21: 15-17).


"We at least know that Paul went to Rome, but there is no concrete evidence Peter ever did. Which makes sense, since Paul was to be the Apostle to the Gentiles and Peter the Apostle to the Jews."

Where have you been? No protestant or fundamentalist scholars make this claim anymore. The evidence that Peter died in Rome is so overwhelming that it's silly to even make the claim he never went to Rome.

The Christian historian Eusebius wrote in the 3rd century that Peter was martyred with Paul in Rome.

Saint Irenaeus, (2nd century bishop of Lyons, and disciple of Polycarp who was a friend of John the Evangelist), wrote that the Church at Rome was founded by Peter and Paul.

Origin also wrote that Peter died in Rome.

Saint Clement, (the Clement Paul mentions in the Bible), wrote that Peter died in Rome.

St. Ignatius, early 2nd century Bishop wrote that Peter died in Rome with Paul.

Saint Cyprian of Carthage, who died a martyr in 258 A.D., wrote: "On Peter the Lord builds His Chruch, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep....and He assigns like power to all the Apostles-Yet He founded a single chair---a primacy was given to Peter.." (Jurgens, 555-556).

I won't answer the rest of your silly posts because they are just the same old worn out allegations that have been around since Luther, Calvin, Zwingle and the other self-appointed popes and false authorities - - - and they are just too easy to refute. Your knowledge of Scripture and Church history is shallow, and all you have to talk about are the age old things that Protestant pastors and anti Catholic web sites spew day and night. But you just got your lunch eaten in this debate, if you chose to read it, that is. Maybe now you'll ask your pastor or fundamentalist instructor a few questions.

120 posted on 07/13/2003 2:15:38 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur; ELS; BlackElk; Aquinasfan; american colleen; NYer; Catholicguy; Desdemona; maryz; ...
Interesting post - sorry I missed the program on Martin Luther. Aside of today's showing (which I was not aware of until after it was over) I can't find a listing advertising when it will be reshown. :-(
121 posted on 07/13/2003 3:50:36 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: TheCrusader
Your post reveals a cherished combination of traits - intelligence and guts

You know, it wasn’t so long ago that many were ready to acquiesce to the rabid the anti-Catholic attacks that plagued Free Republic. Of course, a few of us didn’t subscribe to that response. We stood up to those attacks just as we stand up to anti-American attacks and Anti-Conservative attacks.

You would have been most welcome during those days. You are most welcome here now.


126 posted on 07/13/2003 8:36:05 PM PDT by Barnacle (A Human Shield against the onslaught of Leftist tripe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: TheCrusader
A perfect example once again of circular Catholic reasoning. Tradition is equal to Scripture, and to prove it we'll cite several examples of tradition to prove it. Forget the Scripture that proclaims Christ as the Rock, the foundation stone of the church, even the words of Peter himself. By Jesus day, the traditions of the religious leaders were cited authoritatively to their hearers as irrefutable truth to be accepted unquestioningly and obeyed. The Catholic church is the modern day equivalent of that corrupt self-perpetuating monstrosity that had replaced the authority of the Word of God. Fortunately there were too many reformers by the 1500 and 1600s for the Catholic church to slaughter, as the Muslims did their "infidels," and too many copies of the Bible in the language of the common man to continue to deceive the whole continent of Europe as had been the case for several hundred years.

We're never going back to those days, gentlemen. What the Pope says has no more validity than what any Christian says. It never did. But now most of the world recognizes it.

The hypocrisy and rotteness of the RCC has never been more apparent than in the ongoing scandal of the current epidemic of child molesting priests. Typically, instead of treating these perverts as the criminals they are, the RCC prefers to try to quietly spirit them away to a new parish unbeknownst to the unsuspecting parishioners. And why not? What the Bible says makes no difference to the church any more today than it did, with each doctrinal departure of Scripture down through the centuries.

This arrogance is so blatant the RCC even has to resort to such chicanery as offering its own revised version of the Ten Commandments, leaving out the commandment against graven images. Oh, but if you point out how Catholic doctrine contradicts Scripture you are "anti-Catholic" engaging in "Catholic-bashing."

Now that Mary has been exalted to virtual deity status in Catholic practice, what's next? Maybe in addition to such unscriptural and recent perversions of Christianity as claiming Mary's immaculate conception , and ascension into heaven, we will soon be told to look for Mary's Second Coming instead of Christ's.

Catholics claim not only that Mary was perfectly sinless from conception, even as Jesus was (doctrine of the "Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary," proclaimed by Pope Pius IX in 1854 -- "Let all the children of the Catholic Church ... continue to venerate, invoke, and pray to the most blessed Virgin Mary, mother of God, conceived without original sin."), but that the reason she never sinned at any time during her life was because she was unable to sin (cf. Lk. 1:46,47; Rom. 3:10,23; 5:12; Heb. 4:15; 1 Jn. 1:8,10). Catholics also believe that Mary was a perpetual virgin (cf. Ps. 69:8; Matt. 1:24,25; 13:54-56; Mk. 6:3; Jn. 7:5), and that she was assumed, body and soul, into heaven shortly after her death (doctrine of the "Assumption of the Virgin Mary," declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950). Finally, she was given the title "Mother of the Church" in 1965. The consequence of all this veneration of Mary, in effect, establishes her authority above Christ's! Rome says, "He came to us through Mary and we must go to Him through her."

There are some Roman Catholic observers that continue to believe that Mary has still not officially been proclaimed "Co-Redemptrix with Christ." In fact, the premier issue of the Roman Catholic publication Catholic Heritage displayed a front page with the title: "Mary, Mother of the Church." In a Question and Answer column the question is asked, "At the foot of the cross, Mary shared in the mystery of the passion. True or False? Answer: True. Mary united her sorrows to those of her Son. The sorrowful and immaculate heart of Mary bled with her Son for all of mankind. For this reason, we invoke her under the title of Co-Redemptrix."

During the past forty years, each pope has done his part to increase Mary's influence in the Roman Catholic Church, based completely on tradition rather than upon the Bible. In the 8/25/75 issue of the official Vatican newspaper, L 'Osservatore Romano, Pope Paul VI, speaking of the ceremony celebrated the day before in honor of the Madonna at the Feast of the Assumption of Mary, said, "Her venerate image, known as 'Salus Populi Romani,' was carried in procession from St. Mary Major's as part of the Holy Year ceremonies, so that the overflow crowd of pilgrims, coming from all parts of the world, could see it and thus increase their devotion to her. In this way we should all be reminded of the meaning and practice of the cult of Mary, inseparable from the unique and central cult of Christ ... Let us pray to her with humble, trusting, and childlike faith."

The present pope, John Paul II, has dedicated himself completely to Mary. During his visit to Vancouver, B.C. in 1985, the special souvenir edition of B.C. Catholic carried a full page color photo of the pope under the caption of Totus Tuus, which, in Latin, means "all yours." The following explanation was then given: "When Karol Wojtyla [John Paul II] was consecrated bishop of Krakow by Pius XII in 1958 he took, 'Totus Tuus' (all yours) as his motto, thus presenting himself to Mary. In his first Urbi et Orbi message immediately after being elected pope he said, 'At this difficult hour, full of fear, we must turn our thoughts with filial devotion to the Virgin Mary who always lives in the midst of Christ and exists as his mother. We must repeat the words, Totus Tuus which 20 years ago were inscribed into our heart and soul.'"

Additionally, in "The Holy Father's Prayer for the Marian Year," John Paul II asks Mary to do what only God can do -- comfort, guide, strengthen, and protect "the whole of humanity ..." His prayer ends: "Sustain us, O Virgin Mary, on our journey of faith and obtain for us the grace of eternal salvation." What blasphemy to ask Mary to obtain what God offers freely by His grace through Christ! (4/97, Berean Call). To conclude the Marian Year, John Paul II's televised rosary on June 6, 1987, viewed by an estimated 1.5 billion people and broadcast by Vatican Radio in 35 languages, featured the pope praying to Mary and seeking her blessings. The pope concluded, "with a smile from the Virgin Mary, the rosary will bring to our world the tender tones of God's love for anxious humanity in the 20th century" (David Cloud, 6/13/97, FBIS). More recently, at his general audience in St. Peter's Square on 4/9/97, Pope John Paul II said that Mary uniquely collaborated in the work of salvation. According to the 4/9/97 Vatican Information Service, the pope stated that "in union with Christ and yielding to Him, She collaborated to obtain the grace of salvation for all humanity." He also said: "Having created man 'male and female,' in the Redemption too, the Lord wanted to put the New Eve next to the New Adam. ... Mary, the New Eve, thus becomes the perfect icon of the Church. She, in the divine plan, represents under the Cross redeemed humanity, which, needy of salvation, is made capable of offering a contribution to the development of the saving work."

This is nonsense, of course. The Bible nowhere says that Mary collaborated in salvation. The Bible nowhere says that Mary is the New Eve. To the contrary, the Bible says that the Lord Jesus Christ is the sole mediator between God and men (1 Timothy 2:5) and that He "BY HIMSELF purged our sins" (Heb. 1:3). Christ had absolutely no help in obtaining our salvation. Mary was a sinner and was saved in the same way that all sinners are saved -- by placing her faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. She is not the Mother of God or the Queen of Heaven. The Apostles did not exalt Mary nor did they teach us to pray to her. She cannot answer prayer nor assist anyone in their needs, neither spiritually or physically (David Cloud, 4/27/97, FBIS).

On 5/7/97, Pope John Paul II dedicated his general audience to "the Virgin Mary" and urged all Christians to accept Mary as their mother. He noted the words spoken by Jesus on the cross to Mary and to John -- "Woman, behold thy son!" and "Behold thy mother!" (John 19:26,27), and he claimed that in this statement "It is possible to understand the authentic meaning of Marian worship in the ecclesial community ... which furthermore is based on the will of Christ" (Vatican Information Service, May 7, 1997).

John Paul II underlined that "the history of Christian piety teaches that Mary is the path that leads to Christ, and that filial devotion to her does not at all diminish intimacy with Jesus, but rather, it increases it and leads it to very high levels of perfection." He concluded by asking all Christians "to make room (for Mary) in their daily lives, acknowledging her providential role in the path of salvation" (Ibid.).

This is heretical and blasphemous. Mary was a sinner who was saved by grace in the same manner of any sinner who trusts Jesus Christ for salvation. The Bible says absolutely nothing about her beyond this. She is not the Mother of God or Ever Virgin or the Queen of Heaven or Co-Redemptress with Christ. She cannot hear or answer prayer, which is a prerogative of Almighty God alone. The Apostles taught absolutely nothing about "Marian worship." Men do not need Mary to bring them to Christ. The needy sinner comes directly to the Lord Jesus Christ, the sole Mediator between God and men: "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time" (1 Tim. 2:5-6). Christ promised, "COME UNTO ME, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest" (Matthew 11:28). The Bible nowhere invites men to come to Mary or to trust Mary or to pray to Mary (David Cloud, 5/7/97, FBIS).

Pope John Paul II has visited many of the major Shrines to Mary. He attributed his escape from death at the hands of a would-be assassin and the overthrow of communism in Eastern Europe to the intervention of Mary. In 10/95, he said, "Mary is recognized and venerated as the true Mother of God and the Redeemer ... she contributed effectively to our spiritual birth and to the development of the life of grace within us." In his 12/18/96 general audience, he stated: "Mary intensely and mysteriously unites her life with Christ's sorrowful mission: She was to become her Son's faithful coworker for the salvation of the human race" (2/17/97, Christian News). In his general audience on 6/19/96, he proclaimed that Mary was sinless throughout her life:

"At today's general audience, Pope John Paul continued his catechesis on Mary, recalling that the Church holds, in the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, that she was preserved from original sin at the first moment of her existence and, as well, that 'Mary was free from personal sin and moral imperfection throughout her life.' The Holy Father went on to say that 'the possibility of sinning does not spare even a Christian who is transformed or renewed by grace ... unless, as the Council of Trent stated, a special privilege assures such immunity from sin. This is what happened to Mary.' The council, stating that the Church 'firmly holds this (privilege of Mary), ... confirms its solid doctrinal character'" (6/19/96, Vatican Information Service, Vatican City).1

A Roman Catholic priest, in the Summer 1991 issue of the Fatima Crusader, said that Mary came to Fatima to save our souls and that Mary herself said that "I will save the world, with my Rosary and My scapular." The priest also said that if a Catholic says the Rosary every day, and always wears the scapular of Mary, then she is bound to save you from hell, a guarantee for salvation!!

Millions of Catholics are making pilgrimages to the various Marian shrines, seeking and often claiming miracles of healing and answers to their prayers to Mary. New apparitions of Mary and special messages from her are being claimed in various parts of the world [even on the outside glass walls of a Savings & Loan building in Florida in 1996!]. On 6/20/96, more than 1,000 Catholic priests gathered in Fatima, Portugal, for the First International Meeting of Priests. The Vatican Information Service said that the priests gathered at the foot of the statue of Mary and "consecrated themselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary." (Reported in a 6/28/96 FBIS report.)

The Winter '94 Fatima Crusader (published by Roman Catholics) had the following quotes: "Madonna has a share in the royalty of God ... One rightly calls her Jesus' Queen-Mother, and ... She now takes her place in glory at Her Son's right hand. ... Yes, O Mary, Mother of God, Sovereign Virgin, God's most glorious creature, we want to follow You as our Queen of love, who art all-powerful ... The Holy Mother of God revealed ...: 'I am She who is in the Divine Trinity ... Submit yourself to the authority of the Pope ...' The Madonna brings Jesus to us and takes us to Jesus. That is why we call her Mediatrix. ... Mary came to Fatima to save souls from Hell. ... Mary said, 'Through the Rosary and Scapular I will save the world.'"

The 6/97 issue of New Covenant magazine features an article by Catholic priest Michael Scanlan entitled, "Mary, Spouse of the Holy Spirit: What God Has Joined Should Remain Joined in Our Hearts." New Covenant is a charismatic Roman Catholic publication which promotes charismatic experiences and traditional Catholic doctrines. Scanlan is the head of the Franciscan University of Steubenville in Ohio. (The Catholicism of the Franciscan University is even more dangerous than traditional Catholicism, because its adoption of charismatic experience has given it a semblance of Biblical piety and spiritual fervor.) Consider the following amazing excerpt:

"Today, I sense a new oneness, or completion, in my spiritual life as I seek to join Mary and the Holy Spirit in my prayer. I've also seen this new fullness and vitality flow into student groups on our campus and into prayer groups as they've celebrated the spousal unity of our Lady and the Holy Spirit. ... Mary didn't say, 'I was immaculately conceived,' as if it were a past event and she just wanted to reinforce the fact of her sinless conception. Mary identifies herself as the Immaculate Conception in the present tense ... to show that, from her conception forward, her spirit has been totally united and totally subjected to the Holy Spirit. Thus Mary became the spouse of the Holy Spirit when she was conceived, not years later when she gave her consent to the angel Gabriel and conceived Jesus by the power of the Holy Spirit. ...

"This spousal union is such that you can't have one without the other: The Holy Spirit is present wherever and whenever He acts. I don't claim to fully understand this mysterious unity, but I know that any attempt to divorce Mary and the Holy Spirit impoverishes us spiritually. It's only to the extent to which Mary and the Holy Spirit are together in our hearts, minds and spirits that we can experience the power and grace of their spousal union.... "I pray the De Montfort Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary every morning. ... I specifically invite our Lady, my Mother and Queen, to oversee, guide and protect my day, consecrating all that I do to her ... At the same time, I invite the Holy Spirit to guide, empower, enlighten and inspire my day. Since I've started consciously uniting Mary and the Holy Spirit, I have experienced new blessings of infused prayer and the presence of the Lord Jesus and the Father. ... Both Mary and the Holy spirit are given to us and for us as advocates. Both Mary and the Holy Spirit serve to mediate grace in our lives" (Michael Scanlan, "Mary, Spouse of the Holy Spirit," New Covenant, June 1997, pp. 16-18).

This is absolute blasphemy. Nowhere in the Scriptures is Mary exalted this way. Not one time do we find the Apostles or early Christians praying to her. None of the Apostolic epistles to the churches even mention her. Everything Scanlan says about Mary is based on human thinking apart from divine revelation, and the Mary that he consecrates his life to exists only in his imagination.

The Franciscan University sponsors annual "Defending the Faith" conferences, in which Catholic dogma is upheld and defended with great boldness. One conference in 1996 was dedicated to "Mary as spouse of the Holy Spirit." The announcement said, "Rediscover Mary's prophetic role through her recent apparitions." The cover of the 1997 issue of the Franciscan University Summer Conference Magazine features this prayer by President Scanlan: "With renewed fervor, we reconsecrate our lives and our work to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary."

The following random quotes from the book Ten Series of Meditations on the Mystery of the Rosary, by John Ferraro, is intended to give an overview of Roman Catholic dogma concerning the Virgin Mary. Ferraro's book was given the Nihil Obstat and the Imprimatur, which is an official statement by the Roman Catholic Church that the book "is free of doctrinal or moral error." Therefore, we can take these quotes as official Roman Catholic doctrine:

(a) She [Mary] is co-Redemptrix of the human race.

(b) The church and the saints greet her thus: "You, O Mary, together with Jesus Christ, redeemed us."

(c) God has ordained that no grace will be granted to us except through Mary. It is a doctrine preached by all the saints that no grace will come to us from heaven without passing through Mary's hands. No one will be saved nor obtain mercy except through You, O' heavenly lady. Remember this well, no one will enter heaven without passing through Mary as one would pass through a door. O' Mary, our salvation is in your hands.

(d) During His passion, Mary suffered in her heart all the pains that Jesus suffered in His body. For this reason, God exalted her so greatly.

(e) Mary is our co-Redemptrix because she gave us Jesus pledge of our salvation. Furthermore, she is co-Redemptrix of the human race, because with Christ she ransomed mankind from the power of Satan.

(f) Jesus redeemed us with the blood of His body, Mary with the agonies of her heart.

(g) We were condemned through the fault of one woman; we are saved through the merits of another woman. Just as Eve was the root of death for everyone, so Mary was the source of life for everyone.

(h) Mary is our co-Redemptrix because she suffered in her heart whatever was lacking in the passion of Christ. Are we obligated to Jesus for His passions? -- so we are indebted to Mary for her participation in His passions. She gave birth to Jesus with joy; she gave birth to us, brothers of Jesus, in anguish and sorrow.

(i) Mary, Queen of the Apostles: She is queen of apostles because she formed them and directed them in their preaching. Mary is Queen of Apostles because by herself she routed all the heresies. Mary is Queen of Apostles because she is mother of grace and channel of mercy. She is Queen of Apostles because in her every hope is life and virtue. She is Queen of Apostles because she is conqueror of the Infernal Dragon. [Yes, Mary, not Christ is the one who will defeat the Devil, according to this statement]

(j) If we spread devotion to Mary, we will gain heaven -- "Who explains me will have life everlasting."

(k) God shared His power with her [Mary]. "My mother, ask, for I must not turn away your face." Christ speaking to Mary: "Without your command, no one shall move hand or foot in the whole land."

(l) All grace is passed from God to Jesus, from Jesus to Mary, and from Mary to us. The grace of God, cure for our ills, comes to us through Mary like water through an aqueduct.

(m) Mary is the compliment of the Holy Spirit. Before God she asks not -- she commands!

(n) No true devotee of Mary will be damned because she is the terrible conqueror of the devil.

(o) Because she believed in Christ's mission of salvation, she became the co-Redemptrix of the whole human race.

(p) Mary is holier than the saints, loftier than the heavens, more glorious than the cherubim, more venerable than any other creature.

(q) No one can acquire an intimate union with Jesus and a perfect fidelity to the Holy Spirit without being greatly united with Mary.

(r) It is necessary for us to have a mediator 'besides' Jesus as mediator, and we will never find one more qualified than Mary. (Emphasis added.)

(s) It was never written of anyone that he became a saint without having a special devotion to Mary.

(t) When God deeply loves a soul, and finds it stained with sin, He covers it with a beautiful mantle that makes it precious to Him -- that mantle is Mary.

(u) Mary is the ark of salvation built by God on the deluge of our faults so that whoever desires may enter and be saved.

(v) Whoever is enamored of Mary, attaches his soul to a steadfast anchor that will draw him to the port of happiness.

(w) It is important to be devoted to Mary as it is to enter heaven, because no one can enter Paradise who is not devoted to Mary.

(x) In reward for humility, God gave to Mary the power of filling with blessed souls the thrones left empty by the rebellious angels.

(y) Mary is secretary of the King of Heaven. It is she who writes in the Book of Life the names of the predestined, and signs them with the emblem of God. She herself is the Book of Life from which God will read the names of the elect on the day of judgment.

(z) To be devoted to you, O' Mary, is a weapon of salvation which God gave to those whom He positively wants to save.

There is absolutely no Scriptural foundation for any of the beliefs or practices detailed in this report. Mary was indeed a virgin in fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecy that Christ would be born of a virgin (Isa. 7: 14). She was a godly woman, but not sinless. As with all true believers in Christ, when Mary died, her soul and spirit went to heaven, but her body awaits the resurrection. She did not bodily ascend to heaven as did Jesus Christ. Nothing in Scripture indicates that prayers were ever offered to Mary nor that she was worshiped by anyone. Most of Roman Catholic teaching concerning Mary is based entirely on human tradition and contradicts God's Word.

This blasphemous dogma [Mary's sinlessness] detracts from the sinlessness of Christ, who ALONE was born of a virgin and immaculate. The Bible nowhere says Mary was sinless. It says 'all have sinned and come short of the glory of God' (Rom. 3:23). The only exception is the Lord Jesus Christ, who alone is 'holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens' (Heb. 7:26). Mary knew her own sin and acknowledged her need of a Saviour (Luke 1:47). None of the Lord's Apostles exalted Mary; none of them applied to her such titles as sinless, immaculate, ever-virgin, Mother of God, Blessed Virgin, Holy Queen, Queen of Heaven, Our Lady, Co-Redemptress, Immaculate Virgin, etc. The Apostles taught us that Jesus Christ ALONE is the Mediator between God and men (1 Tim. 2:5). The Roman Catholic Church's doctrine of Mary is blasphemous error. Mary cannot answer prayer. She cannot aid in man's salvation. She cannot intercede with Christ in behalf of God's people. She is not Queen of Heaven. The only Queen of Heaven mentioned in Scripture is an Old Testament idol (Jer. 44:18-19). Every prayer addressed to Mary is idolatry. If the Roman Catholic Church did not hold any false doctrine other than its dogmas pertaining to Mary, the Bible would require us to reject it as a false church on this basis alone.

The pope also cited the Council of Trent as authority for his position on Mary. The Council of Trent was a Catholic council held from 1545-1563 in an attempt to destroy the progress of the Protestant Reformation. This council denied every Reformation doctrine. Trent hurled 125 anathemas (eternal damnation) against Bible-believing Christians. The Council of Trent has not been rejected by modern Catholicism. The modern Popes and Councils continue to cite it as authoritative. [Maybe I'll call this "Protestant-bashing," although for those caught defying Rome's doctrines in that day, you weren't just called names, you were tortured and executed. And if you were fortunate enough to die of natural causes, and Rome found you after your death, often the bodies were dug up, burned, and the ashes scattered. Baptists in America's push for Independence wisely pushed for religious toleration. In contrast to Midieval Europe, America has never had a state church that persecutes its rivals.] When Catholics treat the Bible the same way the liberals treat the Constitution, the practical effect is that it ceases to exist as any objective standard or authority at all. The Constitution has become whatever the Supreme Court says it is at that moment in American goverment. And the Bible to the Catholic church is whatever the Pope, its ever-morphing tradition, and maybe even some apparition at Fatima says it is today, or something entirely different tomorrow.

128 posted on 07/14/2003 5:04:32 AM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson