"Apparently you are unfamiliar with my thoughts or you would not make such a comment. When rulings are made with which I disagree I have no difficulty in saying so. However, I understand that most of the bad ones are the result of the same people on the Court and have replacing them the most important political consideration on my radar screen. I also understand that many of those critical of the court has no understanding of the constitution nor the basis of these rulings. However, it will come through constitutional means not some half-assed, ill-conceived, incompletely thought out, contrived methodology explicitly rejected by the founders. Your lack of grasp of this issue is perfectly illustrated by your belief that the FBI could remove a Justice from the Court against his will without impeachment and conviction. What a dreamer."......and if the Supreme Court rules tommorow that:
A) Wahhabi Islam is the Official religion of the US.
B) Criticism of the Court's ruling constitutes 'hate speach' not protected by the 1st Ammendment and is punnishable by 20 years in prison/re-education camp.
C) Anyone (including the President, Senators and members of Congress and the public) accused by the Court of 'hate speach' is subject search, arrest, and cooercive interegation and has no civil rights.
........your response would be.............(drumroll, please)....... "Let's hope the Court allows us to work within the broken system to change it back to what it once was."
In Revolutionary War times, those people were called, "Tories" and they were invited to emigrate to Canada after the Revolutionary War. Let's see what happens when the Supreme Court rules this fall that the CFR law in no way violates the 1st Ammendment when it bans certain political ads from TV based upon the contents of the ads that certain Senators and Congressmen find offensive. You'll just pout, won't you? Nah, don't answer that. I already know what you'll do.
Read Lincoln's comments on what should be done when the Government abbandons the people and forgets who put it (the Government) in power. Then again, Lincoln had testicles........
Your fantasies are irrelevent to me, no matter how enjoyable they are to you.
What does any of those ridiculous hypothetical proposals have to do with the FACT that the Supreme Court is a co-equal branch of government altogether outside, BY DESIGN, the control of the executive and only answerable to the Congress through the Impeachment mechanism.
What "people" are you referring to? Your writing is as unclear and confused as your understanding of the constitution.