Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exmarine
If you have a degree in history apparently you learned nothing obtaining it. Particularly about politics.

Apparently you did not learn that the SC decides which laws are laws and which are just words on paper. Or that IT WAS ALWAYS THAT WAY.

O'Connor has always been considered a "moderate" don't blame me for it.

What "everybody knows" is not known to me and is generally wrong anyway.

Why is it that Bush, who should have plenty of knowledge of all the problems with illegals since Texas is one of the states most affected, not in the same panic as the experts here? Could it be that, for the most part, it is not a killing issue or one that is easily solved? For all the raving about it there is not ONE practical, implementable idea ever presented on how to solve it.

While amassing historical knowledge you seemed to have missed the FACT that the Executive does not control the Senate and apparently are unaware that the RATS are not helping themselves with these stunts. Let them keep it up only those who want everything to have happened yesterday are upset. Most of the politically aware understand that this is a huge briar patch the RATS are getting themselves into.

After the next election the clueless will be whining again about how the RATS didn't get their message out and that is why they were smashed again.

There are many Republicans who will fight. What crew of absurd non-entities would you support? Harry Browne? Or some one who crawled out from some other rock? Who is going to vote for these people since the most conservative presidential candidate in the last 25 yrs could not even get a majority of popular votes? Last time I checked one had to get more than 2% of the votes to be president.

You will have to face facts at some point and Bush is FAR and AWAY the most conservative president who could possibly get elected. There is no other except in the wet dreams of the hysterically deluded. This is RAT strategy, try and alienate "real" conservatives and turn them against Bush. It won't work but don't let that stop you trying. There are only two sides here Pro or Anti America and you are apparently willing to side with Michael Moore, Dan RAther, CNN, the Dixie Chicks, Jeanine Garofolo, and Tom Daschle. But don't insult us by claiming to be a conservative.

And No there won't be a lot like you. You will merely be part of that 1% who represent no one but the permanently dissaffected. I don't worship heroes though I will praise them.

It is merely hyperbolic hysteria to claim the "entire government ignores the constitution." There is nothing to argue about such a statement which is just silliness.

It matters not what excuse you use for joining the Anti-American side, it only matters that you are.
60 posted on 07/11/2003 12:27:36 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
Apparently you did not learn that the SC decides which laws are laws and which are just words on paper. Or that IT WAS ALWAYS THAT WAY.

Any time you want to match knowledge on history, I'm ready for ya, pal. You need to READ THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. I doubt you have ever read it. It states plainly that CONGRESS is the only branch that can MAKE LAWS. Got it? The SC has no authority to make laws. The SC has invented new laws and rights not found in the Constitution. Tell you what - I'm sick your rude insults.

O'Connor has always been considered a "moderate" don't blame me for it.

I make my own judgments based on facts. I'm not like you - I don't believe everything I'm told. O'Connor is no moderate in my opinion. You can call her anything you want. I don't have to sign on to your judgments - I have a mind of my own, and a good one.

Why is it that Bush, who should have plenty of knowledge of all the problems with illegals since Texas is one of the states most affected, not in the same panic as the experts here? Could it be that, for the most part, it is not a killing issue or one that is easily solved? For all the raving about it there is not ONE practical, implementable idea ever presented on how to solve it

They are not only not solving it, THEY ARE ENCOURAGING IT!!! Put the freaking army on the border! Again, read the freaking constitution - it says the job of the Fed. Govt is to protect the U.S. FROM FOREIGN INVASION! Precisely ONE Congressman is supporting the Constitution on this. ONE - Tancredo. The rest are ignoring their oaths.

Now go away, you bore me boy.

62 posted on 07/11/2003 12:52:29 PM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Apparently you did not learn that the SC decides which laws are laws and which are just words on paper. Or that IT WAS ALWAYS THAT WAY.

Any time you want to match knowledge on history, I'm ready for ya, pal. You need to READ THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. I doubt you have ever read it. It states plainly that CONGRESS is the only branch that can MAKE LAWS. Got it? The SC has no authority to make laws. The SC has invented new laws and rights not found in the Constitution. Tell you what - I'm sick your rude insults.

O'Connor has always been considered a "moderate" don't blame me for it.

I make my own judgments based on facts. I'm not like you - I don't believe everything I'm told. O'Connor is no moderate in my opinion. You can call her anything you want. I don't have to sign on to your judgments - I have a mind of my own, and a good one.

Why is it that Bush, who should have plenty of knowledge of all the problems with illegals since Texas is one of the states most affected, not in the same panic as the experts here? Could it be that, for the most part, it is not a killing issue or one that is easily solved? For all the raving about it there is not ONE practical, implementable idea ever presented on how to solve it

They are not only not solving it, THEY ARE ENCOURAGING IT!!! Put the freaking army on the border! Again, read the freaking constitution - it says the job of the Fed. Govt is to protect the U.S. FROM FOREIGN INVASION! Precisely ONE Congressman is supporting the Constitution on this. ONE - Tancredo. The rest are ignoring their oaths.

Now go away, you bore me.

63 posted on 07/11/2003 12:53:14 PM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson