Skip to comments.
CNN’s Brown Spread “Bush Knew” Web Rumor After It Was Retracted
Media Research ^
| 7-10-03
Posted on 07/10/2003 2:53:22 PM PDT by bellevuesbest
CNN Anchor Pushes Anti-bush Rumor -- Four Hours after its Retraction! When Castigating George Bush for Passing on Bogus Information, Aaron Brown Passes on Web Story He Should Have Known Was False
In the 1990s, the World Wide Web was denigrated in media circles as a nest of White House-bashing conspiracy theorists, a fact-free zone where the scandal stories were too good to check. Last night, CNN NewsNight anchor Aaron Brown pulled a fascinating, though embarrassing trick: While castigating the President for passing on bogus information, he passed on a bogus Internet story he should have known was false.
After the lead story on the WMD search by David Ensor, CNNs all-news anchor jumped on the latest juicy rumor, asking Ensor: There is, as you know, a story that's been circulating on the Web today that there was at some point a conversation between the President and a CIA consultant where the consultant directly told the President that this African uranium deal was bogus. Do you have any reporting that supports the idea that the President was directly told it was fake before he included it in the State of the Union speech?
Clearly flummoxed, Ensor could only say: I have no way to confirm that story and it is somewhat suspect, I would say, but we'll have to check it.
In searching for the Web source of this rumor today, CNSNews.com Executive Editor Scott Hogenson found the story on CapitolHillBlue.com, where founder and publisher Doug Thompson retracted the story under the headline Conned big time at 6:05 pm Eastern Daylight Time -- four hours before Browns exchange with Ensor!
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaresearch.org ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaronbrown; cnn; davidensor; dougthompson; mediabias; mrc; niger; retraction; terrancejwilkinson; uranium; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Registered
You know, we all ought to carry one of those around, to freeps, etc, with our name and photo on it, just in case any journalists ask us who we are, or needs to see credentials. It'll save them time since they'll never have to independently verify who we are.
Do you think their editors will see the humor in it?
41
posted on
07/11/2003 1:39:11 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: All
42
posted on
07/11/2003 1:58:59 AM PDT
by
Terp
(Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
To: bellevuesbest
I was was surfing through CNN last night and heard two hosts, who were discussing some hoax that had misled CNN. They were talking about the problems arising from the very fast dissemination of "news" because of modern technologies, like the internet.
I listened for about 5 minutes, but they didn't mention what the hoax was about.
I guess they liked avoiding the tawdry details of the actual hoax/affair. They obviously preferred discussion on a purer, abstract plane.
I'm glad I was able to come here, to Free Republic, to get the lowdown.
43
posted on
07/11/2003 6:32:24 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
To: Weimdog
44
posted on
07/11/2003 6:34:03 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
To: syriacus
What did he know?
When did he know it?
45
posted on
07/11/2003 6:55:38 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
To: syriacus
Maybe thought ought to hook up all CNN and media personnel to lie detector machines and make them report news with those machines live and let the beeping begin! It would bring a new meaning to the word "REALITY TV"
To: bellevuesbest
bump
47
posted on
07/11/2003 8:24:27 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: bellevuesbest
as expected from CNN.....
48
posted on
07/11/2003 8:42:17 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
(The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
To: syriacus
I guess that's as close to a retraction we can expect from CNN. I don't watch CNN. Did anybody watch Brown last night to see if he admitted he goofed?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson