Replies

Don't hold your breath guys. They ain't gonna find them. Andd its getting to the point that if they claim to find them many just are not going to beleive them. Someone is lying big time - whether its the White House or CIA or whomever.

Oh yeah, that police action is quickly trning into a guerialla war. And I think these guys will be tougher even than the Viet Cong.

Can you spell quagmire.

So you think that Saddam Hussein cleverly managed to secretly destroy the liters of anthrax, VX and mustard gas precursors, etc., already documented by the UN in 1998, despite the fact that revealing prrof of their destruction would have saved his regime?

So you believe that an army that had trouble getting food and clothing to its troops had extra resources to distribute tens of thousands of gas masks and atropine injectors simply to burn more fuel and take space in supply lines?

These guys are tougher tha the VC? Is that the ones who whine every day that they don't have any AC, or the ones who complain about waiting to buy gas? Or do you mean the tough guys who shoved women and children in front of them as they fought?

Vietnam was a mountainous tropical jungle with an unassailable reserve of 4 million well trained men in North Vietnam (same size as the Wehrmacht in June '44) and a superpower sponser. Say what?

That the press circle around our dead in Iraq like buzzards looking for red meat for the treasonous Demonrats doesn't surprise me. What does suprise me are the number of freepers looking to play into their hands and giving into what is becoming a pack-media stampede.

I can understand any number of reasons for opposing the war or wanting us to pull out now (none of which are any good imho), but to call Bush a liar when most of the "sources" are obvious Dem stooges or patent frauds is ridiculous.

Sorry Douglas I can't agree. The Democratic line is "Bush lied" and "Lying about a BJ didn't get anyone killed"
The Democrats are looking for ANYTHING that they can find to show that Bush's moral compass is off.
First he was too stupid, when that failed he was a drunk, when that didn't work he was a cowboy, then they said we could have avoided 9/11 if he'd looked at the evidence, now they say the evidence of WMD was wrong and he acted too soon.
What's missed here is that Bush looked at intelligence he received and made decisions based on it. While it's impossible to please everyone all the time it's impossible to please a Democrat who hates him all the time.
If you listen to the Dems talk nothing Bush has done was right while everything Klinton did was perfect.
We can't demand perfection from anyone, what we can expect is that they will look at the intelligence in front of them and do what is in the best interest of our country.
If the WMD were removed from Iraq prior to the war and "some of us" claim that it never existed they win.<br? What we need to do is ask what happened to the weapons we knew were there and leave it up to Iraq to explain.