[No Truce With Kings]

'Oh I see, one sentence is wrong, so the other 1,000 sentences are now "suspect".'


I am not even sure that the one he is accused of getting "wrong" was wrong. Certainly not in the context of people knowing it was wrong in Dec-Jan.

THE ORIGINAL SOURCE FOR THAT CLAIM WAS SOMEONE *PRETENDING* TO BE A CIA AGENT. (Yes, I *AM* shouting. That deserves to be shouted.)

I have seen no evidence that the accusation that the President or the CIA knew the uranium claim was false came from anyone OTHER than the "source" for the Capitol Hill Blue article that posted the original "Bush Lied" claim.

In other words it is the fabrication of a nutcase who was good enough to fool a reporter. (Not that fooling a reporter is hard, mind. Kind of like getting a junkie to take another drag on the crack pipe.)

Am I wrong?

[Dane]

Am I wrong?

Nope. You are quite succinct. The demo's are grabbing on to anything they can.

[Normal4me]

Is it just me or is the media all now claiming that we went to war over non-existent uranium from Niger? I thought this report had been debunked after the SOTU address and before the war started. It may have been a very small example of why we needed to go but it is FAR from the only reasons.