Scandal!

National Review Online ^ | July 11, 2003 | Clifford D. May

[WarrenC]

President Bush's (and dare I say America's?) enemies are over-reaching again. I say give 'em enough rope.

[foreverfree]

bump

[Support Free Republic]

LOOK! Another Freeper Just Gave To The Cause! WAY TO GO!
	We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one! Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

Spin coming too late. The WH already agreed that the SOTU claim was not true.

[The G Man]

Great article. Definitely a must read.

[pgkdan]

I say give 'em enough rope.

You're right...happens every time!

[zook]

Excellent post!!!

[zook]

No. The WH said there were questions about the evidence. They said the claim shouldn't have been in the SOTU address.

[Saundra Duffy]

Condie Rice has straightened this whole mess out already. The critics who called Bush a "liar" are LIARS themselves.

[WarrenC]

Spin coming too late. The WH already agreed that the SOTU claim was not true.

You might want to actually read the article before making a comment that has no relevance whatever to its content.

[MEG33]

Good info on ex Ambassador Wilson

[kevkrom]

The WH already agreed that the SOTU claim was not true.

Incorrect -- the WH said that the documents in question were false, but did not retract the SOTU claim, nor needed to, as that was not the basis for the president's statement.

[No Truce With Kings]

Twain was right. A lie can get halfway around the world before the truth puts on its boots. I am amazed at the legs the "Bush lied" story is getting -- when it is based on two liars -- Wilson and Wilkinson.

But this article won't convince those that live on the planet Clueless. Nothing will. They glory in their cluelessness.

[talleyman]

Mega bump!

[MJY1288]

Looks like some in the media are catching up to what we already know about Joseph Wilson

[A Vast RightWing Conspirator]

Incorrect -- the WH said that the documents in question were false, but did not retract the SOTU claim, nor needed to, as that was not the basis for the president's statement.

Oh???? What was the claim based on? Someone's imagination? Or they were based on nothing?

[MEG33]

I wonder... which of the Dem candidates would you prefer?

[PhiKapMom]

FYI! Looks like we do have some friends in the media!

[PhiKapMom]

You beat me -- I just pinged you to this thread! Now I wonder if the "mainstream" press is going to pick up on the TRUTH?

[gov_bean_ counter]

Behind it all is an attempt by the very people Ann Coulter wrote about in "Treason" to get Bush to name those who actually contributed to the intel gathering process.

Bush isn't biting.