Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Straw defends UK dossier uranium claims
Press Association ^ | July 12, 2003 | Press Association

Posted on 07/12/2003 7:24:41 AM PDT by ejdrapes

Straw defends dossier uranium claims

Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has defended the Government's decision to include in its first Iraqi dossier claims that Saddam Hussein tried to get uranium from Africa.

CIA director George Tenet has apologised for allowing President George Bush to refer to the alleged trade between Iraq and Niger in his most recent state of the union address, after it emerged that evidence for the claim was based on forged documentation.

Mr Straw acknowledged that the CIA did express reservations about the use of the claim in the British Government's September dossier. But he insisted that it was based on what British officials regarded as reliable intelligence that had not been shared with the US.

In a letter to Donald Anderson, chairman of the Commons foreign affairs select committee, Mr Straw said: "I am writing to deal with two points relating to the statement in the Government's September Iraq dossier that 'Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa'.

"First, press reporting has claimed that this statement is contradicted by the report of a US envoy, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who visited Niger in early 2002 to investigate the subject on behalf of the CIA. I want to make clear that neither I nor, to the best of my knowledge, any UK officials were aware of Ambassador Wilson's visit until reference first appeared in the press, shortly before your hearings last month. In response to our questions, the US authorities have confirmed that Ambassador Wilson's report was not shared with the UK.

"We have now seen a detailed account of Ambassador Wilson's report. It does indeed describe the denials of Niger government officials in early 2002 that a contract had been concluded for the sale of yellowcake to Iraq. But, as CNN have reported, Ambassador Wilson's report also noted that in 1999 an Iraqi delegation sought the expansion of trade links with Niger - and that former Niger government officials believed that this was in connection with the procurement of yellowcake.

"Uranium is Niger's main export. In other words, this element of Ambassador Wilson's report supports the statement in the Government's dossier.

"Second, the media have reported that the CIA expressed reservations to us about this element of the September dossier. This is correct.

"However, the US comment was unsupported by explanation and UK officials were confident that the dossier's statement was based on reliable intelligence, which we had not shared with the US (for good reasons, which I have given your committee in private session). A judgment was therefore made to retain it.

"Finally, may I underline that the JIC's (Joint Intelligence Committee) assessment of Iraq's efforts to reconstitute its nuclear programme did not rest on the attempted acquisition of yellowcake alone. The Government's dossier catalogued a range of other procurement activities, and referred to intelligence that scientists had been recalled to the programme in 1998. You will be aware of the recent discovery of technical documentation and centrifuge parts - necessary for the enrichment of uranium - buried at the home of an Iraqi nuclear scientist in Baghdad."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dossier; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2003 7:24:41 AM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; piasa; Miss Marple; William McKinley
BUMP! To read and share
2 posted on 07/12/2003 7:34:02 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Chrysler Corporation was to add a new car to it's line to honor Bill Clinton. The Dodge Drafter was to begin production in Canada this year, but the car had to be pulled out of production when initial tests showed that the little white lines on the road kept disappearing all the time.
Free Republic
Your donations keep us laughing at liberals

3 posted on 07/12/2003 7:34:20 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!; MeeknMing; AnnaZ; cyncooper; ladyinred; onyx; JustPiper
BUMP: To read and share
4 posted on 07/12/2003 7:39:40 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
How very interesting! I don't know exactly why, but I smell a big news event happening shortly.

Heheheh.

5 posted on 07/12/2003 7:39:50 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
I wonder why some of the information was withheld from the US? There's another piece of the puzzle to be discussed.
6 posted on 07/12/2003 7:41:31 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I'd rather catch (and hang) the instigators then the perpetrators. That may take more time.
7 posted on 07/12/2003 7:42:49 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Another ping for truth.
8 posted on 07/12/2003 7:45:45 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
I have just realized why the information was withheld: the Senate Intelligence Committee and the House Intelligence Committee, both of which have suspect Rats on them and which would leak information like a sieve.

Perhaps someone FAMOUS was a conduit for the Niger-Iraq uranium sale. Or perhaps a COUNTRY facilitated the sale, perhaps one that was opposed to our intervention in Iraq.

More and MORE interesting!

9 posted on 07/12/2003 7:46:17 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I thought the information that was withheld from the US was regarding intelligence sources?
10 posted on 07/12/2003 7:46:56 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Oops - we posted at the same time. I doubt anyone shares intelligence sources and for good reason.
11 posted on 07/12/2003 7:48:03 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
It might be explained,if it was during the last adminstration. Too many leaks! The only thing kept "under cover during that administration was.....(oH nevermind!)

Remember according to AC in TREASON some sensitive information was withheld even from Roosevelt and Trumen for fear it would be leaked. WIthholding may be good.

Besides we really don't know all the private conversation held between Blair and Bush. (Thinking about their little walks around the ranch.)
12 posted on 07/12/2003 7:48:12 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
That is interesting why it wasn't shared, but I still think the American media should be reporting this. Because the British stand by their claims, one could argue that what Bush said in the State of the Union was not a lie.
13 posted on 07/12/2003 7:48:35 AM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Miss Marple
Looks like we're thinking on the same line.....at the same time....
14 posted on 07/12/2003 7:49:23 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Peach
However, the US comment was unsupported by explanation and UK officials were confident that the dossier's statement was based on reliable intelligence, which we had not shared with the US (for good reasons, which I have given your committee in private session). A judgment was therefore made to retain it.

I suppose this could be sources, but I read it as information. Either one would be dynamite if released by the democrats to the public.

15 posted on 07/12/2003 7:50:09 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
was not a lie.

It may have been inaccurate, but it was never a lie. There is a difference between lying and not having complete exact facts. The Rats don't seem to know the difference. (of course they don't even know what "IS" is or what constitutes sex, so what would you expect.

(Just FII I do not believe in was inaccurate either)
16 posted on 07/12/2003 7:54:14 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
one SHOULD argue that what Bush said in the SOTU was not a lie. He refferenced his source --- end of story
17 posted on 07/12/2003 7:59:25 AM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Best guess?

House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence
108th Congress

 

Porter J. Goss, R - Florida, Chairman

 

Republicans Democrats
   
Doug Bereuter, Nebraska Jane Harman, California, Ranking Democrat
Sherwood L. Boehlert, New York Alcee Hastings, Florida
Jim Gibbons, Nevada Silvestre Reyes, Texas
Ray LaHood, Illinois Leonard L. Boswell, Iowa
Randy "Duke" Cunningham, California Collin C. Peterson, Minnesota
Peter Hoekstra, Michigan Bud Cramer, Alabama
Richard Burr, North Carolina Anna Eshoo, California
Terry Everett, Alabama Rush Holt, New Jersey
Elton Gallegly, California Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland
Mac Collins, Georgia  
   
J. Dennis Hastert, Illinois, Ex Officio Nancy Pelosi, California Ex Officio
   

Best guess within the best guess? What are some of Pelosi's ties to the radical community? Would you share information that goes to her?

Then there is the Senate committee

MEMBERSHIP

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

Pat Roberts, Kansas
Chairman
John D. Rockefeller IV
West Virginia, Vice Chairman
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Carl Levin, Michigan
Mike Dewine, Ohio Dianne Feinstein, California
Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Ron Wyden, Oregon
Trent Lott, Mississippi Richard J. Durbin, Illinois
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine Evan Bayh, Indiana
Chuck Hagel, Nebraska John Edwards, North Carolina
Saxby Chambliss, Georgia Barbara A. Mikulski, Maryland
John W. Warner, Virginia

18 posted on 07/12/2003 8:09:55 AM PDT by William McKinley (From you, I get opinions. From you, I get the story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Perhaps someone FAMOUS was a conduit for the Niger-Iraq uranium sale. Or perhaps a COUNTRY facilitated the sale, perhaps one that was opposed to our intervention in Iraq.

Wee,.....we can be certain that it was NOT Canada!

/sarcasm

19 posted on 07/12/2003 8:13:58 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
If the dems keep beating the dead horse, another non-issue aimed at he White House looks like more political B.S. and guys like Kerry and Edwards will dissolve even further into the night!

Ops4 God Bless America!
20 posted on 07/12/2003 8:14:22 AM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson