[Paul Atreides]

No matter the type of coverage, it is sickening the amount of coverage the media is giving to Bush "photo ops," given the eight years of the media-hog Clintons.

[Miss Marple]

What does it matter when most of those photos are never used in the papers anyway? Why is there a Dose? Because the papers won't print the pictures and we would like to see what the President is doing!

[ThePythonicCow]

Sorry you find it sickening.

One man's "media hog" is anothers "leading with style". Just as guns, war, and diplomacy can be used for good and evil ends, so can the media.

To my view, it is fitting and proper, and in America's best interest, that W. lead, in a publicly visible manner, using the media to gain the support of as many as possible.

It was, and is, disgusting and improper, and harmful to America, that Clinton abuse his office and station, to use the media to flaunt his sick, inflated ego.

[PoisedWoman]

is sickening the amount of coverage the media is giving to Bush "photo ops," given the eight years of the media-hog Clintons.

Yes. But I think it's a good thing the administration is releasing only the ones they like. The media would never have printed a photo of Clinton scratching his tush, but they'd run a Bush scratch on the front page.

When Dubya went to the opening of the Olympics, he sat in a box with his wife. The only time the cameras trained on him were shown on the screen was when he rubbed his nose, etc.