To: Pokey78
Can anyone tell Steyn's position from this article? I think I interpret this article to say, "don't do it to me, but what they do is their business."
That's what the supreme court said.
13 posted on
07/13/2003 1:26:50 PM PDT by
xzins
To: xzins
Steyn's position on sodomy,
from a previous column:
When the rulers insist they know better than the masses, don't be surprised if the masses look elsewhere. I wouldn't vote for a state sodomy law, and some of the sex acts proscribed in the more broadly drawn anti-sodomy legislation I still dream fondly of getting to try one day, if I ever find anyone willing to have sex with me. But the gay lobby hasn't yet closed the deal with the American people on the equalization of homosexual relationships and, by insisting haughtily that it has and that the case is now closed, it's behaving in a manner more appropriate to the diseased Chiraquiste democracies of Europe than to the rough 'n' tumble of America.
15 posted on
07/13/2003 1:36:19 PM PDT by
Pokey78
To: xzins
The Supreme court said that Texas could not enforce a law on their books.
16 posted on
07/13/2003 1:42:29 PM PDT by
maica
To: xzins
Can anyone tell Steyn's position from this article? I think I interpret this article to say, "don't do it to me, but what they do is their business." That's how I read it, as well.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson