Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FBI COMPROMISED BY WAHABBI LOBBY?

Where's Lon Horuchi when you really need him?

1 posted on 07/13/2003 1:14:02 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections

Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 07/13/2003 1:16:34 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy
Where's John O'Neil when you need him?
3 posted on 07/13/2003 1:18:42 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy
There are many threads on FreeRepublic about the re-election of George W Bush.

I will never vote for a President who acts as if the Wahhabis are our friends instead of acknowledging that they are our mortal enemies and acts appropriately towards them.

4 posted on 07/13/2003 1:21:26 PM PDT by Courier (Quick: Name one good thing about the Saudis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy
Mueller is a loser. He has done nothing about the clintonoids in FBI headquarters. He should have been fired long ago, along with George Tenet.

I suspect Karl Rove is the person who is advising Bush to go easy on the Arabs. Rove is a smart guy, but pandering to terrorist-supporting Arabs is not the smartest idea in the world--because frankly it won't work.

I have divided opinions about Bush. He certainly has done a lot of good things in the War Against Terror. Court is still out on the Saudis. There were reasons why he couldn't go after them first, even though they are at the bottom of the whole terrorist threat, and Iraq still needs to be subdued before we go on to the next operation, which should probably be Syria or Iran.

I honestly don't know whether Bush will treat the Saudis as they deserve or not. It's a very delicate and difficult matter and it's too soon to tell, one way or the other.
5 posted on 07/13/2003 1:41:24 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Badabing Badaboom
FBI ping
9 posted on 07/13/2003 2:07:38 PM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy
There is a strange consistency about the Clinton and Bush administrations playing Godfather to the Muslim groups. The pattern seems to be to use the Muslims as proxy-warriors to empower groups indebted to the USA. However, the plan - if such there be - falls apart with the fanatic loyalty to Islam. By definition, they can't allow an indebtedness to Western powers. They are better prepared to risk starvation & death.

Clinton and Bush both totally ignored the Afghan opium crops, even though they represent a huge and ongoing narco-terrorism to the USA.

Bush has never said a word against Clinton that I'm aware of. His sealing of Presidential records protected the hell out of Bill & Hillary.

Something just doesn't fit. Or, maybe it does when properly viewed.
13 posted on 07/13/2003 2:54:58 PM PDT by ZEEGIRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy
bttt
14 posted on 07/14/2003 2:35:53 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson