To: BudgieRamone
Yeah that's great.
If the man fools around, he's at fault, and he loses 50% of everything, plus continuing child support.
If the wife fools around, the man loses 50% of everything and he's responsible for continuing child support.
It sure is a fair system!
16 posted on
07/15/2003 6:53:32 AM PDT by
aShepard
To: aShepard
Child support should be apportioned without regard to fault for the break-up of the marriage. The kids are entitled to support no matter who strayed.
I'm in favor of returning fault to the equation in terms of property division, however. And no, I don't care how messy and ugly the divorce cases get. That's part of the pain of screwing up, have it all paraded in open court for the edification and amusement of the general public.
To: aShepard
The new math is based on obtaining a spouse who provides 50% of the value/assets, whether male or female. In that case, were custody to be equal, it would be equally unfair to all parties.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson