Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BudgieRamone
Yeah that's great.

If the man fools around, he's at fault, and he loses 50% of everything, plus continuing child support.


If the wife fools around, the man loses 50% of everything and he's responsible for continuing child support.

It sure is a fair system!
16 posted on 07/15/2003 6:53:32 AM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aShepard
Child support should be apportioned without regard to fault for the break-up of the marriage. The kids are entitled to support no matter who strayed.

I'm in favor of returning fault to the equation in terms of property division, however. And no, I don't care how messy and ugly the divorce cases get. That's part of the pain of screwing up, have it all paraded in open court for the edification and amusement of the general public.
19 posted on 07/15/2003 7:02:07 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: aShepard
The new math is based on obtaining a spouse who provides 50% of the value/assets, whether male or female. In that case, were custody to be equal, it would be equally unfair to all parties.
21 posted on 07/15/2003 7:09:53 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson