Skip to comments.
Niger upset by uranium slur
BBC ^
| 07/14/03
| BBC
Posted on 07/16/2003 1:20:54 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
07/16/2003 1:20:56 PM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
But the President didn't say Niger.
2
posted on
07/16/2003 1:22:34 PM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Pikamax
First, Bush said, The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa not that Iraq actually got the uranium, or that the country in question was Niger. Second, Blair et al stand by this statement, despite the falsity of the papers claiming a deal with Niger.
To: All
4
posted on
07/16/2003 1:25:03 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Pikamax
Okay let's send Niger some money to make it all better.
5
posted on
07/16/2003 1:27:50 PM PDT
by
beaversmom
(Celebrating May 5th and all days with an American Flag)
To: Quilla; newgeezer
The Niger's in my hood say Niger all da time.
6
posted on
07/16/2003 1:29:39 PM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
To: Pikamax; newgeezer
Niger upset by uranium slur This reminds me of the time Marion Berry said the law of gravity is racist. Now the very elements are racist.
7
posted on
07/16/2003 1:31:23 PM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
To: Pikamax
France? France? Did someone say France and uranium and Iraq in the same story?
To: Quilla
In fact he might have meant France.
9
posted on
07/16/2003 1:34:03 PM PDT
by
snooker
To: DWPittelli
First, Bush said, The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa not that Iraq actually got the uranium, or that the country in question was Niger. Second, Blair et al stand by this statement, despite the falsity of the papers claiming a deal with Niger.The media and the democrats ALWAYS mis-state the truth. Then again "democrats" and "truth" is like mixing water and oil.
10
posted on
07/16/2003 1:39:50 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: snooker
Right. And this was reported by the BBC so we know it's true. I guess it was taken from the Niger office of the Gallop organization. You know they just went around and asked the free people of Niger what they thought about this. A majority said that when they were watching the broadcast of Preident Bush's SOTU speech on their plazma TVs back in January they were immediately offended and started writing their representatives in government to take action.
11
posted on
07/16/2003 1:43:00 PM PDT
by
marlon
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Pikamax
First we said Africa not Niger.
Second we said "tried" to buy.
Third what the hell does MAKE mean: Should Niger make the US apologise?
14
posted on
07/16/2003 1:49:36 PM PDT
by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
To: Pikamax
"Should Niger make the US apologise?" Make, make. Niger and who's army?
15
posted on
07/16/2003 1:51:48 PM PDT
by
sd-joe
To: biblewonk
Now the very elements are racist. All but the noble gases.
-PJ
To: Pikamax
Hey Niger...
To: Pikamax
On the other hand, the fact that Niger is taking this so personally makes me wonder if they'd tell the truth even if they had sold uranium to Saddam. Ambassador Wilson concludes that it did not happen because Niger denies it. If you'd sold uranium to Saddam Hussein, would you admit it? And if you were Saddam Hussein, wouldn't you use forged documents to get uranium, if that is what it took?
The speculation is that the French originally gave the documents to Britain and swore them to secrecy. My recollection is that Niger was once part of French West Africa, so that seems to support the linkage of Niger with this document. The fact that whoever gave the document to Blair is also refusing to waive the confidentiality also makes me think it is the French. I am sure that they would withhold info on where the document came from in order to embarrass Bush.
But I can't think of any reason that anyone would forge this document other than to trick Niger into selling them the uranium, unless (1) to embarrass the US (but how could they have known at the time that it would cause such embarrassment?), or (2) to sell the document for money (but if they were doing that, why wouldn't they try to sell it to the CIA instead of the French or whoever gave it to the British?). My guess is that the document is genuine--a genuine forgery that Saddam was using to try to get uranium from Niger.
To: Pikamax
If one is to believe the International Atomic Energy Agency, Niger has already sold Iraq 280,000 kgs of yellowcake in '81 and '82. See"Fact Sheet: Iraq's nuclear Weapon Programme" IAEA 25 April, 2002. We anxiously await YOUR apology Mr Hamadou.
19
posted on
07/16/2003 3:03:08 PM PDT
by
barkeep
To: Pikamax
Joseph Wilson, a former US diplomat who went to investigate the issue in Niger concluded as much, saying that controls on Niger's uranium mining were far too strict for any deal with Iraq to be credible. No one said that they actually sold it, only that Saddam sought uranium from Africa.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson