Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/16/2003 1:20:56 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pikamax
But the President didn't say Niger.
2 posted on 07/16/2003 1:22:34 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
First, Bush said, “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa” – not that Iraq actually got the uranium, or that the country in question was Niger. Second, Blair et al stand by this statement, despite the falsity of the papers claiming a deal with Niger.
3 posted on 07/16/2003 1:24:27 PM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
LOOK! Another Freeper Just Gave To The Cause! WAY TO GO!
We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

4 posted on 07/16/2003 1:25:03 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Okay let's send Niger some money to make it all better.
5 posted on 07/16/2003 1:27:50 PM PDT by beaversmom (Celebrating May 5th and all days with an American Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax; newgeezer
Niger upset by uranium slur

This reminds me of the time Marion Berry said the law of gravity is racist. Now the very elements are racist.

7 posted on 07/16/2003 1:31:23 PM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
France? France? Did someone say France and uranium and Iraq in the same story?
8 posted on 07/16/2003 1:33:59 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
First we said Africa not Niger.

Second we said "tried" to buy.

Third what the hell does MAKE mean: Should Niger make the US apologise?

14 posted on 07/16/2003 1:49:36 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"Should Niger make the US apologise?"

Make, make. Niger and who's army?

15 posted on 07/16/2003 1:51:48 PM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Hey Niger...


17 posted on 07/16/2003 1:54:01 PM PDT by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
On the other hand, the fact that Niger is taking this so personally makes me wonder if they'd tell the truth even if they had sold uranium to Saddam. Ambassador Wilson concludes that it did not happen because Niger denies it. If you'd sold uranium to Saddam Hussein, would you admit it? And if you were Saddam Hussein, wouldn't you use forged documents to get uranium, if that is what it took?

The speculation is that the French originally gave the documents to Britain and swore them to secrecy. My recollection is that Niger was once part of French West Africa, so that seems to support the linkage of Niger with this document. The fact that whoever gave the document to Blair is also refusing to waive the confidentiality also makes me think it is the French. I am sure that they would withhold info on where the document came from in order to embarrass Bush.

But I can't think of any reason that anyone would forge this document other than to trick Niger into selling them the uranium, unless (1) to embarrass the US (but how could they have known at the time that it would cause such embarrassment?), or (2) to sell the document for money (but if they were doing that, why wouldn't they try to sell it to the CIA instead of the French or whoever gave it to the British?). My guess is that the document is genuine--a genuine forgery that Saddam was using to try to get uranium from Niger.
18 posted on 07/16/2003 3:01:40 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
If one is to believe the International Atomic Energy Agency, Niger has already sold Iraq 280,000 kgs of yellowcake in '81 and '82. See"Fact Sheet: Iraq's nuclear Weapon Programme" IAEA 25 April, 2002. We anxiously await YOUR apology Mr Hamadou.
19 posted on 07/16/2003 3:03:08 PM PDT by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Joseph Wilson, a former US diplomat who went to investigate the issue in Niger concluded as much, saying that controls on Niger's uranium mining were far too strict for any deal with Iraq to be credible.

No one said that they actually sold it, only that Saddam sought uranium from Africa.

20 posted on 07/16/2003 3:06:13 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"Niger's French-run mines come under the control of the French atomic energy commission."

And we all know that FRENCH companies and officials would never make deals with Sadamn!/sarcasm
21 posted on 07/16/2003 4:07:17 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Freedom is not Free - Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson