Which of course will translate into a advantage for the jackass party. Face it in 92 a vote for Perot WAS a vote for Clinton. But, hey at least you'll have a clear conscience.
And spare me your screeds about DU and closet democrat, as I've pointed out previously, my voter registration and donation are public records.
????? Methinks you have me confused with another poster. I never said that. In fact, I agree with your assesment of GWB. We conservatives at least have a chance with the GOP. We have none at all with the jackass party and vote for a third party is a throw away vote which means advantage jackasses.
One thing about the left that the right hasn't figured out- they were willing to take thier gains in incremental steps. We conservatives haven't quite figured that out yet.
I didn't vote for 41 because of his fiscal policies. Bush 43 doesn't appear to have paid attention to what happened to 41.
Fiscally, Former President Clinton wasn't too bad... not that you'd trust him with your dog or daughter. I don't care if President Bush is a nice guy, I care about the $ that he's pouring down ratholes trying to suck up to people who aren't goint to vote for him.
And spare me your screeds about DU and closet democrat, as I've pointed out previously, my voter registration and donation are public records.
????? Methinks you have me confused with another poster. I never said that. In fact, I agree with your assesment of GWB. We conservatives at least have a chance with the GOP. We have none at all with the jackass party and vote for a third party is a throw away vote which means advantage jackasses. One thing about the left that the right hasn't figured out- they were willing to take thier gains in incremental steps. We conservatives haven't quite figured that out yet.
Sorry, I didn't mean you specifically... it was a general comment.
Consider for a moment that we switched the names of the parties in power and it were a democratic house, senate and president.... who would be supporting President Bush and their Rep?