[Dane]

And after all that BS, you're putting forth the he's better than a Democrat argument? That's it? That's the big peg on which you hang your hat?

Like I said in my reply #141, you are now in temper tantrum mode.

You came up with 4 demos with good ACU ratings, and ignored the other 200 demos in the House with bad ones.

But what the hey you are in the motions to hang yourself and I will follow the old adage of when a political enemey is hanging himself, I get out of the way.

I am getting out of the way, post(hang yourself) away.

[Dane]

You came up with 4 demos with good ACU ratings, and ignored the other 200 demos in the House with bad ones.

Just to revise my remarks, you also couldn't find a demo Senate member with a good ACU rating.

[ModernDayCato]

I don't know what you're talking about...but then again I think you've proven that you aren't all that articulate. So, let's review. Here are your arguments, for those who tuned in a little late:

1. I said that you and others of your ilk are appeasers, because we are actually fighting a culture war, which as John Fonte so eloquently pointed out, is Gramsci vs. Tocqueville in America. By allowing Bush to stray from our side (which is a REAL stretch, since I think he's actually part of the other side, truth be told) without consequence (in fact, with your active support), you are an enemy appeaser. Plain and simple. Your response? No, you are.

2. You then said that Bush is 100 times better than any Democrat. I pointed out that there were many Democrats with better ACU scores than a lot of Republicans (including my RINO Congresscritter and John McCain), so Bush wasn't 100 times better than ANY DEMOCRAT. You told me I was parsing, and your real argument came to the surface, which is At least Bush is a Republican, not a Democrat.

Every time I have tried to engage in a debate, you start pontificating and accusing me of throwing a tantrum.

The truth is not a tantrum, my friend.