Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sirchtruth
Oh, BTW, the thrust of my response is directed at "but you can't come up with another person who is electable, that would be better" this line.

The balance of your argument seems to be that if you wait, the grand design will emerge, and all this spending will ... gee, I'm not sure what you think will happen to all this spending.

Because if there is one fact in Washington, it is this: No spending program is ever removed without an act of G-d.

So, we will have these vast new spending programs, in perpetuity. Please explain to me how this is even remotely conservative.

261 posted on 07/21/2003 5:36:12 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz
So, we will have these vast new spending programs, in perpetuity. Please explain to me how this is even remotely conservative.

The point is that it is not conservative, but tax cuts are!

The balance of your argument seems to be that if you wait, the grand design will emerge,...

In the scheme of things, yes, that is my argument. I don't think for one second Bush is finished. However, I do think that whatever plan he has is on the backburner to the WOT.

I'm saying we're arguing about two things here because I can not deny you are right in your assessment that this kind of spending is socialistic as a hole, but that is only one aspect of the whole argument.

264 posted on 07/21/2003 6:01:21 AM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson