[inquest]

I'll see your forgivness and raise you one. Forgive me and many others on this forum for simply making it clear that his actions have shown him to be less fiscally conservative than his predecessors, including Democrats. Regardless of how you end up voting, this needs to be constantly pointed out. Perhaps if it's pointed out enough, there will be a conservative capable of winning in 2004, or at least 2008.

But if we just keep sweeping his transgressions under the rug, it seems pretty clear that we'll just keep getting more of the same. What incentive would he and his benefactors have to change their course?

[sirchtruth]

What incentive would he and his benefactors have to change their course?

First and foremost his term is not over! There is not a thing wrong with people pointing out Bush's horrible spending habits. Attention should be brought to this subject but not in this, "I'm going to take my ball go home" kind of manner. From every indication Bush is not fiscally conservative and that sux, but he is not thru yet and he did give us tax cuts, so he is not totally off the reservation.

All I am saying is that Bush's liberal money burning is not enough yet to make me willing to give up on him so a dem can be elected.

Are you willing for this to happen?