[sirchtruth]

Here, have some Kool-Aid.

Bring it on!

I don't have a problem with anyone critizing Bush for spending, but to outright give the election to the other side because of it is ridiculous and irresponsible.

Do you penny pinchers think for one second a Caroyl Mosley-Braun would be more up to your standards. Maybe Howard Dean, who loves Hillary's presciption for Healthcare....

HELLO!!!!

[joesnuffy]

I don't have a problem with anyone critizing Bush for spending, but to outright give the election to the other side because of it is ridiculous and irresponsible.

I think the point is "we have met the other side...(and it is starting to look like) ...."he is us" The democraps want to drive the bus off the cliff at 100 mph and the repubs have decided to drive it off the cliff at 35 mph imo

[HostileTerritory]

If (heaven forbid) Carol Moseley-Braun were President, the Republican Congress would have killed her prescription drug bill, NEA, NEH, and other librul spending programs. We'd have real conservative budgets and she'd have to put up or shut up.

With President Bush, we have good conservatives racing to cosponsor his big government spending plans because he's the party leader.

So, yes, in terms of cutting down big government instead of injecting it with steroids, I'd rather have a real conservative or a helpless Democrat than Dubya. Clinton was the best thing that could ever have happened to our party.

Or do you think that Dennis Hastert and Bill Frist want to do Howard Dean ANY favors?