To: JohnHuang2
If they love Canada so much, why don't they stay there?
2 posted on
07/24/2003 12:43:42 AM PDT by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
To: JohnHuang2
Main Entry: mar·riage
Pronunciation: 'mar-ij
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Old French, from marier to marry
Date: 14th century
1 a : the state of being married b : the mutual relation of husband and wife : WEDLOCK c : the institution whereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family
4 posted on
07/24/2003 4:41:32 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: JohnHuang2
"We are not seeking special treatment," Perry said in a statement. "We seek equal treatment. That is the only gay agenda equality for everyone under the law." Wrong. You are seeking special rights. You are seeking the right to marry someone of the same gender. This is a special right. At this moment in time you already have all the same rights that I do. You can marry any woman who will consent to marry you. You don't need any special rights, you need to get healed of your mental disease.
"To not recognize my marriage and the marriages of thousands of other same-sex couples, would be discrimination and we will not stand for that any longer," he said.
First, you don't have a marriage as marriage is between a man and a woman. Secondly, it is in society's best interest to discriminate against certain pervese behaviors such as child molesting, beastiality, necrophilia and homosexuality
5 posted on
07/24/2003 6:06:30 AM PDT by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: JohnHuang2; scripter
6 posted on
07/24/2003 6:29:44 AM PDT by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: JohnHuang2
"I don't care what the U.S. government says. My partner, Phillip, and I are legally married under Canadian law," Perry said after his ceremony, according to the newssite 365gay.com. "We've put our nation on notice: We're coming home and we are legally married," he added. Uhh, thanks for the notice. So you're legally married in CANADA. When did Canadian law become US law. Moron.
To: JohnHuang2
"I don't care what the U.S. government says. My partner, Phillip, and I are legally married under Canadian law," Perry said after his ceremony, according to the newssite 365gay.com. THEN MOVE TO CANADA, YOU COMMUNIST BASTARD. Don't shove your CRAP down OUR throats if WE do not want it!
:/ ttt
8 posted on
07/24/2003 7:36:26 AM PDT by
detsaoT
(Socialism Is Bankruptcy - just ask Kalifornia (or The City Of Evil!))
To: JohnHuang2
Most gay men find gay relationships to be a pain in the ass.
9 posted on
07/24/2003 7:38:05 AM PDT by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Ozzy Osborne says that pot leads to harder drugs.)
To: EdReform; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
10 posted on
07/24/2003 7:59:06 AM PDT by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: JohnHuang2
Bump.
11 posted on
07/24/2003 8:23:40 AM PDT by
DoctorMichael
(>>>>>Liberals Suk. Liberalism Sukz.<<<<<)
To: JohnHuang2; scripter; GrandMoM
"We are not seeking special treatment," Perry said in a statement. "We seek equal treatment. That is the only gay agenda equality for everyone under the law." This, of course, is the biggest, most brazen lie this alleged man of God could say.
Fact is, they already have equal rights under the law as citizens of this country. What they want is the "right" to serve in the military openly (putting their sexual orientation in front of wanting to serve their country), marry, adopt, teach their "lifestyle" in public schools and bugger your children.
Nobody has the right to do any of those things, and they bloody well should not be given that right because of how they like their sex.
It is sick. It is disgusting. It is perverse.
And I don't know what God this guy thinks he is serving, but he sure as hell's not serving mine.
14 posted on
07/24/2003 12:00:25 PM PDT by
Houmatt
("Best that we can do is alert people there to LP and the truth that FR has fallen."--The Toddler)
To: JohnHuang2
"We've put our nation on notice: We're coming home and we are legally married....NOT!
16 posted on
07/24/2003 3:08:08 PM PDT by
GrandMoM
("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
To: JohnHuang2
Perry, who considers himself the first national homosexual-rights leader to marry in Ontario, argues the U.S. government, through a concept called "lex loci contractus," has recognized marriages performed validly in other countries, including Canada.If that were the case, the US would have to recognize Islamic polygamous marriages. It doesn't, so it isn't.
That doesn't mean the unelected liberal SCOTUS superlegislature won't step in to give us a boost down the road to hell by sanctifying perversion in the name of marriage.
To: JohnHuang2
"We are not seeking special treatment," Perry said in a statement. "We seek equal treatment. That is the only gay agenda equality for everyone under the law."
Sorry, that's just not true. They seek to eliminate one of many commitments that go into a Marriage.
I've pointed this out on other "same sex marriage threads," and I'll repeat it here.
Marriage is a three party contract between a man (one party must be a man), a woman (one party must be a woman) and a community (a social group of some kind that sanctions the marriage). The community could be a church, or a village, or a tribe, or a state or even a kingdom.
The full terms of the marriage contract are:
- The man and the woman agree to be faithful to each other and take vows of fidelity to each other.
- The man and woman together commit to the community that they will produce children (or at least give their best efforts to produce children) to ensure the survival and growth of the community.
- The man and woman agree to raise their children to obey and respect the morals, customs and laws of the community and to become productive members of the community when they mature.
- The community agrees to provide social and protective services to support the family (the man, the woman and the children they produce), and to assist in raising the children to respect the morals, customs and laws of the community.
Proponents of same sex marriage want to eliminate the commitment of the married couple to produce children. They want to freeload off the children of the heterosexual married couples.
Traditional married couples in any Canadian province (or any state in the US if that ever happens) that allows same sex marriages should not have children in that province (or state). They should either move prior to having children, or they should just not bother having children. If marriage doesn't include a commitment to produce children, and same sex couples are under no obligation to produce children, why should traditional married couples go to the expense, pain and trouble to have and raise children?
20 posted on
07/24/2003 5:59:32 PM PDT by
cc2k
To: JohnHuang2
Gay marriage is such a pain in the rear.
27 posted on
07/25/2003 8:09:33 AM PDT by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Ozzy Osborne says that pot leads to harder drugs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson