More study, more bucks down a rathole.
To: bruinbirdman
Are there any sheep we can tax for the money?
To: bruinbirdman
I don't know anything about meteorology, but does it really take ten years to study it? Don't we have sophisticated computers these days to simulate most of the scenarios.
3 posted on
07/24/2003 1:05:38 PM PDT by
Satadru
To: bruinbirdman
With Bush's recent penchant for sucking up to liberals on domestic policy, I am not very happy about this new study.
I fear his administration will get behind some Chicken-Little environmental whacko initiatives to "take the environmental issue away from the Democrats."
More triangulation.
4 posted on
07/24/2003 1:06:48 PM PDT by
Maceman
To: bruinbirdman; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
5 posted on
07/24/2003 1:06:54 PM PDT by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: bruinbirdman
And now he's pandering to the Nader crowd? It never ends.
6 posted on
07/24/2003 1:09:01 PM PDT by
Cagey
To: bruinbirdman
I would rather have a Bush administration study than a UN study, which has been the case up to this point.
Plus, a 10 year study is good. Global warming (if true which I doubt it is) would require huge policy changes. It requires a long, intensive study.
7 posted on
07/24/2003 1:10:43 PM PDT by
what's up
To: bruinbirdman
I just hope that Dr. S. Fred Singer heads this up. And if he is not the head, I hope he is an important part of it.
9 posted on
07/24/2003 1:11:15 PM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: bruinbirdman
to determine whether greenhouse gases and other human-generated pollutants have contributed to an unnatural warming of Earth's atmosphere Who cares if human or not? That's not important, shouldn't even be a consideration. What's important is what temperature will give optimum plant growth, rain fall, and save human lives, and what technologies can we use to get there?
10 posted on
07/24/2003 1:11:19 PM PDT by
Reeses
To: bruinbirdman
11 posted on
07/24/2003 1:12:00 PM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: bruinbirdman
SPOTREP
To: bruinbirdman
Ha, ha, ha! Study it to death for 10 years (thereby removing it as a political issue). Wonder if Bush will "study" any other irritating dem policy issues.
15 posted on
07/24/2003 1:20:05 PM PDT by
ntnychik
To: bruinbirdman
This effectively stalls the argument for 10 years until a time when it will either be totally discredited or will have lost its politically-chic status. Not a bad thing at all.
Michael
To: bruinbirdman
A rectal thermometer placed in France can provide valuable preliminary data. The Solar System is just passing through a warm part of the Aether. No problem.
20 posted on
07/24/2003 1:38:50 PM PDT by
Consort
To: bruinbirdman
On global warming, Dennis Miller said:
There's a lot of differing data, but as far as I can gather, over the last hundred years the temperature on this planet has gone up 1.8 degrees. Am I the only one who finds that amazingly stable? I could go back to my hotel room tonight and futz with the thermostat for three to four hours. I could not detect that difference.
22 posted on
07/24/2003 1:40:41 PM PDT by
brewcrew
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson