Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Bet the tape is heavily edited. Ever see a conservative who wasn't? There is also the matter of the viewer not having a clue who is testifying, what they said in other hearings and what they are hiding.
34 posted on 07/26/2003 4:34:29 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: DPB101
Bet the tape is heavily edited. Ever see a conservative who wasn't? There is also the matter of the viewer not having a clue who is testifying, what they said in other hearings and what they are hiding.
I see no reason to suppose that the original unedited tape even survives, let alone is available to the public.

And it the difference between the unedited Rodney King video, placed in context by competing lawyers in front of a suburban jury, and the edited version incessantly rebroadcast to "the community," bears remembering. The difference, that is, between the initial acquittal of Stacy Koon--and the riot immediately following it!

At a minimum we need a posting of the transcript of the actual hearing, annotated with the cuts made for effect by the traitors.

Better would be an audio if not a video dramatization of the missing parts; it would only be fair if an attractive actor made a sympathetic portrayal of the McCarthy role, given that the traitors committed the original offense against the record by cutting out the actual video.


37 posted on 07/26/2003 7:06:03 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson