Skip to comments.
Japan Votes to Send Troops to Iraq (banzai alert)
Yahoo! News ^
| July 25, 2003
| AP
Posted on 07/25/2003 11:36:35 AM PDT by El Conservador
TOKYO - Japanese lawmakers voted to send Japanese forces to Iraq (news - web sites) to help with reconstruction, despite delaying tactics by the opposition that deteriorated into a wild shoving match.
The passage of the bill was a victory for Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, who campaigned hard to send peacekeeping troops overseas as he seeks to raise Japan's profile on the world stage.
He also aims to distance his administration from the "checkbook diplomacy" for which the world's second-richest nation was criticized during the 1991 Gulf War (news - web sites).
Opposition parties criticized the legislation, saying such peacekeeping missions could violate Japan's pacifist constitution and put its troops in the line of enemy fire.
The legislation had already passed an upper house committee with support from Koizumi's three-party coalition, which controls a majority in both chambers of Parliament.
During the committee meeting, outraged opposition legislators shouted and tried to push their way through a ring of ruling party lawmakers to get at the committee chairman, who had cut short the debate. The chairman called a vote amid the grappling and tackling.
The opposition had tried to stall passage of the legislation for days, submitting one censure motion after another against Koizumi, his Cabinet ministers and other ruling party officials in Parliament with long filibuster-style speeches and slow-motion voting.
Koizumi's ruling party had vowed Friday to convene Parliament over the weekend if necessary to ensure the peacekeeping bill was passed before the current legislative session ends next Monday.
The peacekeeping bill allows Japanese ground troops to provide non-combat support for U.S.-led forces in Iraq. It also gives the government power to send forces to trouble spots around the world to offer medical assistance, repatriate refugees, reconstruct buildings and roads and give administrative advice even on missions that have yet to receive the United Nations (news - web sites) backing.
Military planners are reportedly considering sending a contingent of up to 1,000 combat engineers and other troops for transport and construction duties in Iraq.
Small Japanese military contingents have participated in several U.N. peacekeeping operations since 1992, most recently in East Timor (news - web sites).
The United States and close ally Britain are having mixed success in recruiting help in Iraq. France, Germany and India have declined to take part. There are currently about 147,000 U.S. troops and 13,000 troops from other countries in Iraq.
U.S. officials have expressed hope that Pakistan and Turkey will also join.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allies; allyjapan; iraq; japan; jdf; koizumi; peacekeepers; rebuildingiraq; stabilizationforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Time to allow Japan to have a full-capablilty military???
I'm for it!!!
Banzai!!!
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
HMB/Bizarre PING....
If you want on or off this list, FReepmail me!
FYI: This has fast outgrown it's original "charter" and become a home for the truly bizarre. An alternative saying/phrasiology is being sought (and suggestions are very welcome!). Also, like it's "cousin list" the B/C list, it has become a high-volume list.
I'm leaning toward "Just damn," on the suggestion of quite a few folks. I won't make a decision until Sunday. (And thanks to all of you for sending your suggestions!)
2
posted on
07/25/2003 11:38:19 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: El Conservador
Well domo arrigato
3
posted on
07/25/2003 11:40:05 AM PDT
by
doodad
To: El Conservador
yep and another slap in the face to the french and german scum!!!! i love it lol
4
posted on
07/25/2003 11:40:22 AM PDT
by
rrrod
To: El Conservador
They do know they are supposed to land the planes and not dive-bomb them when they get to their destination this time right?
5
posted on
07/25/2003 11:40:27 AM PDT
by
Texas_Dawg
("...They came to hate their party and this president... They have finished by hating their country.")
To: El Conservador
They can only be defensive troops. They cannot be offensive (according to their constitution, unless of course, they've changed it)
6
posted on
07/25/2003 11:42:16 AM PDT
by
bedolido
(please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
To: bedolido
Either way defensively or offensively it'll confuse the hell out of the Iraqis. Good move!
7
posted on
07/25/2003 11:46:24 AM PDT
by
Lee Heggy
(Jealousy-The theory that some other fellow has just as little taste.)
To: El Conservador
Fomr the nation that invented the suicide bomber.
8
posted on
07/25/2003 11:49:59 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(!)
To: El Conservador
Kakkate Koi!
9
posted on
07/25/2003 11:52:32 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Kakkate Koi!)
To: El Conservador
I sure hope someone went over there to train the troops. They haven't been active since WWII. The best defense is a good offense...
10
posted on
07/25/2003 11:55:39 AM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(You bring tar, I'll bring feathers....recall Davis in 03!!!)
To: El Conservador
I sure hope someone went over there to train the troops. They haven't been active since WWII. The best defense is a good offense...
11
posted on
07/25/2003 11:55:39 AM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(You bring tar, I'll bring feathers....recall Davis in 03!!!)
To: El Conservador
I sure hope someone went over there to train the troops. They haven't been active since WWII. The best defense is a good offense...
12
posted on
07/25/2003 11:55:40 AM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(You bring tar, I'll bring feathers....recall Davis in 03!!!)
To: TheSpottedOwl
Damn pop up ads...sorry for the triple post.
13
posted on
07/25/2003 11:56:18 AM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(You bring tar, I'll bring feathers....recall Davis in 03!!!)
To: ChadGore
some people were not happy though
Opposition lawmakers swarm a chairman to stop the passage of the Iraq (news - web sites) bill forced by the ruling party lawmakers at the upper house in Tokyo Fridat, July 25, 2003. The ruling party plans to approve the Iraq bill which enables the Japanese government to dispatch Self-Defense Forces to Iraq to help reconstructing the war-torn country. (AP Photo/Itsuo Inouye)
14
posted on
07/25/2003 11:57:08 AM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: El Conservador
It's about time Japan take some of the responsibility for providing security in the Gap.
15
posted on
07/25/2003 11:57:36 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: TheSpottedOwl
When the Japanese set their minds to do something, they go all the way. I'm sure they will be adequately trained.
16
posted on
07/25/2003 11:58:08 AM PDT
by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: bedolido
They can only be defensive troops. They cannot be offensive (according to their constitution, unless of course, they've changed it) I bet these Japanese troops will fire back if they get fired upon.
17
posted on
07/25/2003 11:59:39 AM PDT
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: El Conservador
TORA TORA TORA
18
posted on
07/25/2003 11:59:51 AM PDT
by
TheRightGuy
(ERROR CODE 018974523: Random Tagline Compiler Failure)
To: Pikamax
You missed one.
To: berserker; Pikamax
Thank goodness we haven't had a political tussel like this involving Hillary! or Nancy Pelosi. I would hate to see this much leg on either of them. *eew*
20
posted on
07/25/2003 12:02:24 PM PDT
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson