Skip to comments.
Make Americans safer by repealing victimless crime laws
www.lp.org/lpnews ^
| 7.25.03
| Bill Winter
Posted on 07/26/2003 10:10:56 AM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
the crimes against persons and property the FBI tracks in its Uniform Crime Report -- ranging from murder to simple property crimes -- the annual clearance rate is an astonishingly low 19.6%.
what do private civilians need a gun for just call the police and they will protect you /sarcasm
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
2
posted on
07/26/2003 10:14:56 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
To: freepatriot32
I fully expect the WOD types to be here any moment calling you a smelly long haired hippy doper radical anarchist DU'er.
3
posted on
07/26/2003 10:15:35 AM PDT
by
dark_lord
(The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
To: freepatriot32
I'm sure the authoritarians will be along shortly telling us how these crimes affect "society", and how "selfish" the anarcho-ideologues are.
4
posted on
07/26/2003 10:16:35 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
To: freepatriot32
Yes, but Marijuana is a gateway drug.
5
posted on
07/26/2003 10:21:35 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: freepatriot32
In every city in America there are outstanding warrents on thousands of convicted felons who have not showed up for sentencing. There are generally only a small handful of cops assigned to find and arrest these people. We could significantly reduce real crime if we put the resources we spend enforcing the laws described in this article into tracking down and arresting the career criminals who have already been convicted.
6
posted on
07/26/2003 10:29:56 AM PDT
by
Hugin
To: freepatriot32
what do private civilians need a gun for just call the police and they will protect you /sarcasm As crime rates go up, clearance rates go down. This in turn reduces disincentives for committing crimes, allowing crime rates to go up further.
Unless citizens are allowed to be armed. If citizens can arm themselves, then as crime rates go up, citizen armament rates will also go up. This in turn increases the risk of criminals hitting an armed victim, providing an increased disincentive to committing crimes. Thus crime rates can be kept in check.
7
posted on
07/26/2003 10:31:00 AM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: freepatriot32
Some people say there is no such thing as a "victimless crime". They are very wrong. Here is just one example.
In North Carolina it is AGAINST THE LAW (a crime!) to have in your possession a lottery ticket! Now tell me, whose the victim in this crime?
8
posted on
07/26/2003 10:31:52 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: freepatriot32
If someone breaks into your house, there's only a 12.7% chance that the burglar will face charges. What exactly does that figure mean? Is that the ratio of burglaries to charges brought, or is that the estimated ratio of distinct burglars to charges brought, or what?
9
posted on
07/26/2003 10:33:18 AM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: Phantom Lord
Some people say there is no such thing as a "victimless crime". They are very wrong. The so-called "victimless crimes" make the "perpetrators" into victims of the government. So those people's statement is correct--just not in the way they intended.
10
posted on
07/26/2003 10:35:02 AM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: jmc813
Happy to agree with everything in this article, whether that makes me a libertarian or not I am unsure but sense somehow trumps political affiliations in my book. I have for years worked with many "criminals" whose only "crime" was to engage in activity that harmed no one but themselves and that others found "morally offensive".
A guy who deals dope to kids is a dirtbag that deserves to be put away. A guy who smokes a little ging to unwind is no more a criminal than someone that stops at the local pub to have a few pints. As a matter of fact the guy having a few pints and getting behind the wheel of a car is a far greater danger to society then the guy sitting at home smokin dope and watching Pink Floyd's "The Wall".
So if its really about protecting society, as criminal justice is supposed to be, shouldn't we be more focused on those people that engage in activity that actually is a threat?
11
posted on
07/26/2003 10:35:39 AM PDT
by
The_Pickle
("We have no Permanent Allies, We have no Permanent Enemies, Only Permanent Interests")
To: dark_lord
What are WOD types?
I don't know if I'm a WOD type or anti WOD type but I agree with this article.
12
posted on
07/26/2003 10:38:53 AM PDT
by
Courier
(Bring joy to Jedda, re-elect Bush)
To: *Wod_list
*Wod_list
To: freepatriot32
WOW! This article is just chock full of...whattyacallit, GOOD SENSE.
Seems to me that the only people who find fault with it would be those who cannot mind their own business, and must meddle in others'.
14
posted on
07/26/2003 10:41:45 AM PDT
by
Long Cut
(Mini-Cut: Our baby BOY born 10 July 2003, 7 pounds, 13 ounces. Welcome to the world, SON!)
To: The_Pickle
I have for years worked with many "criminals" whose only "crime" was to engage in activity that harmed no one but themselves and that others found "morally offensive". There are unfortunately many on this board who would imprison - and perhaps execute - people who commit "morally offense" victimless crimes, if they had their druthers. These same people, had they been born in Saudi Arabia rather than the U.S., would undoubtedly be Jihadist fanatics.
15
posted on
07/26/2003 10:45:06 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: freepatriot32
The worst thing about many of these laws is that they could take absolutely model citizens and both taint them as criminals and sour them on legitimate law enforcement.
16
posted on
07/26/2003 10:46:12 AM PDT
by
Courier
(Bring joy to Jedda, re-elect Bush)
To: freepatriot32
For some people, gambling can be a problem that leads to financial ruin and despair. But for most Americans, "gambling is simply a matter of fun, a voluntary and harmless pursuit that many find rewarding. In moderation, it is neither less wholesome nor less rational than other sources of entertainment," wrote Guy Calvert Wanna bet?
*snicker*
17
posted on
07/26/2003 10:46:49 AM PDT
by
Petruchio
(<===Looks Sexy in a flightsuit . . . Looks Silly in a french maid outfit)
To: freepatriot32
"Click It or Ticket"When I saw that on the Interstate Highway signs, a chill ran down my spine.
The Germans must have felt similar things in the 30's.
To: Courier
You forgot to mention that true citizenship status is removed by taking away voting rights for felony possession charges. This is truly the meaning of being disenfranchised.
19
posted on
07/26/2003 10:52:57 AM PDT
by
PaxMacian
(Gen 1:29)
To: Balding_Eagle
Did you notice that was one weekend they gave out 425,000 tickets at $100 means they took in $425,000,000. Not bad for standing around harassing and holding up people on their weekend.
20
posted on
07/26/2003 11:03:54 AM PDT
by
PaxMacian
(Gen 1:29)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson