Coulter merely said Horowitz was wrong, and Horowitz has as much since agreed with her. I don't recall Ann ever saying or implying that those who disagree with her are traitors or treasonous.
Cripes. It won't be long before some editor (who hasn't read her book) starts off a review by calling her an "Arian" and uses swastikas for quote marks. The liberals are getting very shrill. Even the moderates are beginning to notice.
First off, Ann's whole act is shrillness. Second, by "the liberals" do you mean Dorothy Rabinowitz? The WSJ Editorial page?!
I guess what annoys me about these ersatz defenses of Coulter is their Buchanan-like absolutism. If you criticize St. Ann, you're a liberal and a traitor. A conservative isn't allowed to disagree with her for any reason since to do so would make that person a RINO/Liberal/Traitor.
If Ann is going to pad her generous bank account by constantly blasting others, she should have a little thicker skin when people reasonably disagree with her.
Its been done already in a snide fashion. In Slate, Sam Tanenhaus, compared her to Elizabeth Dilling.