Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wilhelm Tell
I agree with your points.

I am puzzled as to why Taylor was told to resign but the rebels were not warned to disarm at the same time Taylor is being made to leave. I mean if we were going to crush both sides of the fight and be neutral do gooders, fine. But in asking Taylor to leave but allowing the rebels to remain in the field and armed means we have taken sides with teh Muslim rebels and are not honest brokers.

What makes those Muslims any better than Taylor?

14 posted on 07/27/2003 7:06:17 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
They aren't, to the best of my knowledge, state sponsors of al-Qaeda. They appear to be pawns of one of the many African nations that Taylor has pissed off over the years.

Besides, Taylor has been Qadaffi's puppet for years (he was originally trained in Libya), his alleged Christianity aside. Defeating him is yet another blow to Libya's nascent African empire and what gives Qadaffi a bad day is almost always a good thing.
15 posted on 07/27/2003 7:20:08 PM PDT by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson