Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GAY COP FIRED FOR SEX WITH BOY GETS JOB BACK (Idiots!)
People/UK ^ | 7.26.03

Posted on 7/28/2003, 3:53:43 AM by mhking

A GAY cop sacked after being convicted of indecency with a boy of 16 has got his job back, The People can reveal.

PC Matthew Cowling, 23, was reinstated - even though a judge put him on the Sex Offenders Register for five years.

The extraordinary decision by a tribunal has shocked Metropolitan Police top brass and rank-and-file officers used to seeing offenders booted out of the force for ever.

One well-placed Scotland Yard source said: "It's ludicrous but unfortunately is typical of the way the police is going."

Cowling will even get about 12 months' back pay of £24,000. The Old Bailey heard how the boy was 15 when Cowling met him.

A 16-year-old girl on work experience at the police station in Bexleyheath, south east London, told the PC her friend had come out as a homosexual.

She offered Cowling the lad's phone number and the officer arranged to meet him outside the police station.

Cowling denied they had full sex and insisted he believed the boy was older.

The officer, who continued seeing the boy after he turned 16 in October 2000, was arrested and accused of a series of sexual encounters in an alleyway at Bexleyheath.

Cowling denied all charges and was cleared in April last year of a serious sex assault and charges of indecent assault and gross indecency.

But he was convicted on one count of gross indecency in the alley when the boy was 16. As he was given a conditional discharge, even his defence lawyer accepted it meant the end of his career.

Cowling, a cop for three years, was sacked by a Met discipline board two months after the trial. But he put his case to the Metropolitan Police Authority appeals tribunal, which reinstated him last month.

The Home Secretary heard such cases until the panel took over the role last year.

Now officers can get their jobs back on a majority ruling by the four members - a lawyer, an authority member, a former chief constable and a retired chief superintendent.

A MPA spokesman said: "The tribunal will consider arguments from the officer and police and reach a decision in accordance with the evidence."

Yesterday, as police were trying to recruit at a Gay Pride march in London, a Met spokesman confirmed: "An officer has been reinstated but is yet to take up a new post."

Our source said: "The Met should encourage a diverse range of people. But you have to ask if this officer epitomises gay pride in the force."

Cowling, who now lives near Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, said: "I don't wish to discuss this."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 7/28/2003, 3:53:44 AM by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
And the decision is....Just damn.

HMB/Bizarre PING....

If you want on or off this list, FReepmail me!

This is the evolved "Hold muh beer"/"Really bizarre" ping list. Subject-matter can be as pedestrian as the moronic left, or as exotic as the news from Mumbai.

Thanks everyone for your suggestions, and keep in mind, that the volume of this list has grown into a "high volume" state (much as it's B/C list-cousin).

2 posted on 7/28/2003, 3:54:03 AM by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
"Now officers can get their jobs back on a majority ruling by the four members - a lawyer, an authority member, a former chief constable and a retired chief superintendent."
Now how did three of these guys agree to give this guy his job back? That is the mystery here.
3 posted on 7/28/2003, 3:59:24 AM by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mhking
For cryin out loud!
4 posted on 7/28/2003, 4:00:17 AM by Cold Heat (Negotiate!! .............(((Blam!.)))........... "Now who else wants to negotiate?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
GAY COP FIRED FOR SEX WITH BOY GETS JOB BACK (Idiots!)

?....Prison rape?

5 posted on 7/28/2003, 4:01:12 AM by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mhking
My husband, a civilian working for the Air Force, worked with a guy who was caught stealing from the BX while TDY. He was fired and then given his job back with back pay. Your tax dollars at work.
6 posted on 7/28/2003, 4:19:42 AM by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
an authority member

Anyone know what an authority member is in American English?

7 posted on 7/28/2003, 4:21:12 AM by razorback-bert (White Devils for Al-Sharpton 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
From the looks of the news over there, everyone
loves George Michael, even though Michael was arrested by
a US west coast cop for playing with his thingie in front
of him and refusing to put it away. This happened in
a public park restroom, of course. It was widely publicized.
8 posted on 7/28/2003, 4:27:00 AM by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Um...this is really from The Onion, right...RIGHT??? What is in the water over there? Any comments from Tony Blair?

Very disturbing. One of these days, the Lord will tire of laughing at us..and then....*snuff* us all out. Geez.

9 posted on 7/28/2003, 4:50:55 AM by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
ladies and gentleman, western europe, the end of civilization as we know it.
10 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:13:24 AM by hasegawasama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
two guesses: either a civilian Police Commission or a Board which oversees the department's disciplinary actions. The cop had appealed to this board, obviously in more ways than 1.
11 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:16:26 AM by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mhking
This kind of sh*t is to be expected in the UK -- afterall it IS part of Europe, isn't it??
12 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:22:24 AM by F16Fighter (Ann Coulter for Attorney General... Joe Scarborough for VP...Tom Tancredo as Homeland Security Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
How about that!
13 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:24:19 AM by Atchafalaya (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Sneakin Sally Through The Alley!
14 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:27:05 AM by Atchafalaya (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
When I saw the title, I quite naturally thought this was in Massatwosh!ts, or Leftifornia. Sad that the Brits have judges that are so far gone also!
15 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:29:35 AM by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Blows that homosexuals aren't more likely to be pedophiles theory.
16 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:40:07 AM by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
either

"either" usually has an or...grammer queen.

17 posted on 7/28/2003, 5:46:13 AM by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mhking
coming to a department near you, after few more dippy court rulings.
18 posted on 7/28/2003, 10:00:26 AM by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
"either a civilian Police Commission OR a Board"

Is there anything you can get right?

19 posted on 7/28/2003, 1:45:07 PM by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: breakem
You’re right, I was wrong. I quickly looked at your two sentences as the either and or. My apologies. I don’t ping anyone for their grammer mistakes lest they make an issue with mine and you’ve had your share of them too…so lets debate on the substance and not the BS. Truce OK?

BTW I’m not ducking your last two substantive posts/threats to me, they simply came in the doldrums of the thread and I think we both agree we’d like more readership. Further regarding your last two substantive posts/threats to me, you simply regurgitated your same “opinion” on bestiality and consensual pedophilia without any basis in law and I don’t think you ever gave your opinion on adult incest, but anyway, till you can answer “the” question on you know what there’s not much to talk about other than challenging your “opinion” openly for which you cannot defend.

20 posted on 7/29/2003, 4:10:36 AM by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson