This is a Deux ex Machina argument--all journalists have the same politics, because they were born that way. Sorry, but more explanation is needed. And forthcoming from your interpid commentator, as follows:The businesses which make money in journalism do so by following the rules of the business. People who don't want to follow those rules don't decide to become journalists--or go to work for newspapers which fail because they do not attract enough attention. The ones that attract enough attention to be able to charge enough advertising rate to be able to survive, do so by following the rules.The joker is that the rules:
No news is good news, because good news isn't news, andmean that the news is atypical of reality in general, and is predominantly about things which call into question the institutions upon which we depend. The news as defined by commercial viability is inherently slanted to the idea of the need for change. People who like the job of writing such stories are--surprise!--opposed to conservatism.Man Bites Dog makes a better story than Dog Bites Man
Media in the US probably is way too big and powerful. I insist that the Ivy League and wannabees teach this as part of a Postmodern, Anti-Enlightenment curriculum. Is its European- I think so. Capitalism is being abused.
PS: My poster boy, Keith Doberman is a Cornell grad. with an in your face attitude and its sounding like his Countdown is more a countdown to cultural Armageddon.