[mattdono]

COWARDS

Note the specific color. Emphasized.

[anniegetyourgun]

Bunchacrybabies.

[demlosers]

scattering Rats running from the light.

[mil-vet]

I want these scum to pay for the additional sessions THEY caused!

[Liberal Classic]

The other day I was thinking it would be nice if this happened in Washington D.C. once in a while. ;)

[grobdriver]

Perry had to have anticipated this.
Wonder what the reply will be?

[Dane]

Time for the liberal media to set up at a Holiday Inn in OK, LA, or NM.

No doubt the media has known where the Chicken dems II will be today for a week or so.

[MissAmericanPie]

This is a conservative state, and yet dislodging these liberal ticks from Austin and from power is almost impossible.

The Demoncrats have gerrimandered districts for decades. Martin Frost's district takes a torturous route through several cities. Conservative Texans want the gloves off, in Austin and in D.C. We must cast this scum off our backs and out of our lives for good.

[areafiftyone]

I guess Motel 6 will leave the light on for them.

[Xenalyte]

Unspeakable p*ssies ping.

[shamusotoole]

Texans!!! Check your State Constitution!!! There is an emergency clause that permits less than the prescribed quorum to enact legislation. If member insurrection or defection is not an emergency, I don't know what is. These are not kinder, gentler pols. These are traitorous subverters of the legal process.

Get fooled twice, and the "fies" of Texas (and the rest of the country) be upon you. Lead, darn it! Don't follow!

[weegee]

Wasting Texas tax dollars, again!

[swilhelm73]

Alright Texas law experts - what can the Texas legislature/governor do without a quorum in the legislature? Anything? Impeachment? Supplementary spending? Etc?

Make the Dems pay for running off...

Here's one idea, swear to the Dems that you will not bring up redistricting in yet another session...then pass a law making it a serious felony for state legislators to refuse to come to a session.

Then schedule a a session for redistricting...

[rudypoot]

Just think of this behavior the next time you ask yourself, "What would've happened if there was a democrat in office on 9/11?".

[lodwick]

Damm these jackasses - I am sick of these puds.

Bend over and take it dims.

You sick losers.

[Charles Martel]

There's gotta be a creative way of dealing with these cowards. They want to stand just across the state line and thumb their noses? Fine... move the road signs so they just *think* they've left Texas...

[Congressman Billybob]

Democrats in the Texas legislature are like cockroaches in the kitchen, they flee when you turn the lights on. The only difference is that cockroaches look better, and are slightly smarter.

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, now up FR, "Sixteen Little Words."

[ravingnutter]

Found in a search:

Dewhurst said once a second session begins, he will not allow the use of a "blocker" bill -- a long-standing Senate practice that empowers the chamber's minority by requiring a two-thirds vote to open debate.

A blocker is an insignificant bill placed at the top of the Senate agenda. Because rules require that bills be considered in agenda order, debate on legislation behind the blocker bill requires a two-thirds vote to suspend rules.

That means 11 of the 31 members can block debate on a bill if all are in attendance. At present, 11 Democrats and one Republican in the Senate have pledged to vote against debate.

If, in a second special session, Dewhurst placed redistricting first on the agenda without a blocking bill, a simple majority could bring it to the floor for debate.

Dewhurst said he has precedent for that. He noted that then-Lt. Gov. Bob Bullock did not use a blocker bill when the Senate debated redistricting in a 1992 special legislative session.

"I feel obliged to follow the Bullock precedent and put redistricting first," Dewhurst said.

The 1992 special session was intended to set aside a state Senate redistricting plan ordered by a Republican federal court. Democrats pushed through a plan on a partisan 18-12 vote, with three Democrats joining the Republican minority.

Republican senators did not publicly object to the Senate procedures during that special session, which occurred in the middle of candidate filing for the primaries.

The federal court rejected the Senate's map and ordered its own map used for the election. That map gave Republicans four additional state Senate seats.

Lt. Gov. Bill Hobby also tried to avoid a blocker bill in the 1979 regular session to pass legislation creating a presidential primary favorable to the Republican presidential bid of former Gov. John Connally. Twelve Democrats, who became known as the Killer Bees, broke the Senate quorum to kill the bill.

Dewhurst noted that when Hobby threatened to remove the blocker bill in a 1989 special session on workers' compensation insurance, he broke a deadlock and launched negotiations that resulted in passage of a bill.

He said he hopes the same thing occurs this year on congressional redistricting.

"We're engaged in conversation. We have a great tradition of working together in the Senate," Dewhurst said.

He said he also feels confident that the Democrats will not walk out on a second special session.

"We're not going down that road," Dewhurst said. "I expect all of our Democrat senators will work together and we won't be facing the lack of a quorum."

One potential face-saving option for the opponents would be to vote "present and not voting" on the question of bringing a redistricting bill to the floor for debate in this special session. That would allow the Senate majority to pass the bill and avoid a second special session, while the opposition would not have a record of voting for it.

"No decisions have been made at the caucus level," Van de Putte said.

Dewhurst said all he wants is a "fair" redistricting plan. He said that would result in Republicans holding 19 or 20 of the state's congressional seats, "plus Ralph Hall."

Hall, D-Rockwall, frequently votes for President Bush's Republican agenda.

Democrats now hold a 17-15 majority in the state's congressional delegation. Republicans argue that because they hold all the state elective offices and a majority in the Legislature, they also should have a congressional delegation majority.

A map passed by the state House probably would give the GOP 21 seats in the U.S. House. A proposed Senate plan could give the GOP as many as 22 U.S. House seats.

Sen. Jeff Wentworth, R-San Antonio, offered the Senate Jurisprudence Committee another option Friday.

It likely would defeat as many as five incumbent Democratic congressmen, but it would guarantee only 16 Republican and 13 Democratic seats, while three districts would be Republican-leaning but competitive.

"We shouldn't have a map that has 22 Republican districts to only 10 Democratic districts, because this state is not a 70 percent Republican state. It's about 55 to 60 (percent Republican)," Wentworth said.

Dewhurst warns Dems: cooperate or face defeat

[Yudan]

Bounty hunters.

Nothing could be more Texan.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Where are the polls on the Democrats walking? Where are the polls about redistricting?

The Dems have been telegraphing this move for weeks, Perry knew to expect it, and look at how the Senate adjourned early today. That tells me that the GOP thinks the Dems are hurting themselves by walking out.

I expect this game will be played up to the SS on school finance in the fall(right before the Houston elections), and then the topics lumped into the same SS. Then the Dems will be faced with preventing popular reforms that would impact nearly every property owner's wallet if they continue to not show up.

And there is plenty of time for shenanigans in the meantime...