[harpseal]

I don't even think it's possible, given the disparate cultures and societies that exist. Some peoples (such as those in the Middle East and some in Latin America) are simply not suited for a form of government (republic, limited democracy) that promotes capitalism. It's not in their nature, their history, their culture. And to try to force it is foolish.

Given the history of these nations and cultures it is going to take a long time. Japan became a Constitutional Monarchy and Singapore has definitely become a very Capitalist Free market enclave. Likewise in the Middle east there is a very strong trader tradition but the Islamic prohibition on interest and teh Koranic implication that government should be theocratic in nature and enforce Islamic law also get in the way.

[Cacophonous]

Japan converted after getting whipped in WWII, South Korea after fifty years of occupation by the US, and the rest of the Pacific Rim undoubtedly was influenced by the US and British presence.

I for one, do not think it is worth it for the US to commit resources, and most important, lives, to make sure ragheads know how to govern themselves. It's a huge, long-term proposition, expensive in terms of lives (and money) and not worth it.

I would also submit (and risk the wrath of the continually offended) that the Oriental mindset, culture and work ethic are more conducive to representative government than the Middle Eastern.