1 posted on
07/28/2003 10:14:31 PM PDT by
Utah Girl
To: Utah Girl
Much of the negative press, Chalabi argues, is due to translators who have their own anti-American agendas and give American and other reporters their version of what is going on rather than what the Iraqis being interviewed are saying.I've seen in other places that the translators are often ex-Ba'athists or at least they were well-off before the war.
2 posted on
07/28/2003 10:27:21 PM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: Utah Girl
Amazing that anyone dared to print this.
To: Utah Girl
BTTT
To: Utah Girl
Many of these things might have happened earlier had planning not been conducted on two tracks, by the State Department and the Defense Department, until George W. Bush ordered January 20 that Defense would be in charge. State planners had envisioned a very different process, one which would not have put Iraq on the track toward democracy and the rule of law. Fortunately, Defense has been able to do that, with critical help from Chalabi and other Iraqis who share those goals. All the whining comes from State. And the US Military -- unlike most of the rest of the world's militaries -- has a tradition of cherishing the freedoms that must be temporarily surrendered while in the military. Eisenhower and Schwartzkopf have a greater empathy for freedom than Adile Stephenson or Clinton.
5 posted on
07/29/2003 4:45:08 AM PDT by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson